These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30424879)

  • 21. Ability and accuracy of the smartphone-based O`VIEW-M® sperm test: Useful tool in the era of Covid-19.
    Kim KS; Kim JH; Roh JH; Kim D; Kim HM; Jo JK
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269894. PubMed ID: 35709172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the sperm motility analyzer system (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
    Akashi T; Watanabe A; Komiya A; Fuse H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 20662592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the BullMate sperm quality analyzer with conventional means of assessing the semen quality and breeding soundness of beef bulls.
    Palmer CW; Barth AD
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2003 Jul; 77(3-4):173-85. PubMed ID: 12695053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Utilisation of a sperm quality analyser to evaluate sperm quantity and quality of turkey breeders.
    Neuman SL; McDaniel CD; Frank L; Radu J; Einstein ME; Hester PY
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(3):457-64. PubMed ID: 12195806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of the normal sperm morphology value by Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC: comparison with the strict criteria.
    Shibahara H; Suzuki T; Obara H; Hirano Y; Onagawa T; Taneichi A; Takamizawa S; Sato I
    Int J Androl; 2002 Feb; 25(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11869376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods.
    Vyt P; Maes D; Rijsselaere T; Dejonckheere E; Castryck F; Van Soom A
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Dec; 39(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 15598237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms.
    Tomlinson MJ; Pooley K; Simpson T; Newton T; Hopkisson J; Jayaprakasan K; Jayaprakasan R; Naeem A; Pridmore T
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19200972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Importance of papanicolaou staining for sperm morphologic analysis: comparison with an automated sperm quality analyzer.
    Singh S; Sharma S; Jain M; Chauhan R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Aug; 136(2):247-51. PubMed ID: 21757597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Body mass index in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormones in New Zealand men: a cross-sectional study in fertility clinics.
    Macdonald AA; Stewart AW; Farquhar CM
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3178-87. PubMed ID: 24129611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automated smartphone-based system for measuring sperm viability, DNA fragmentation, and hyaluronic binding assay score.
    Dimitriadis I; L Bormann C; Kanakasabapathy MK; Thirumalaraju P; Kandula H; Yogesh V; Gudipati N; Natarajan V; C Petrozza J; Shafiee H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212562. PubMed ID: 30865652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system.
    Hamilton JA; Cissen M; Brandes M; Smeenk JM; de Bruin JP; Kremer JA; Nelen WL; Hamilton CJ
    Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1110-21. PubMed ID: 25788568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer V equine for equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs M; De Vliegher S; De Schauwer C; Govaere J; Smits K; Hoflack G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
    Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 20965556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis.
    Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fresh semen quality in ejaculates produced by nocturnal emission in men with idiopathic anejaculation.
    Meng X; Fan L; Liu J; Wang T; Yang J; Wang J; Wang S; Ye Z
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1248-52. PubMed ID: 23987518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk of childhood mortality in family members of men with poor semen quality.
    Hanson HA; Mayer EN; Anderson RE; Aston KI; Carrell DT; Berger J; Lowrance WT; Smith KR; Hotaling JM
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):239-247. PubMed ID: 27927843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
    Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Semen quality and age-specific changes: a study between two decades on 3,729 male partners of couples with normal sperm count and attending an andrology laboratory for infertility-related problems in an Indian city.
    Mukhopadhyay D; Varghese AC; Pal M; Banerjee SK; Bhattacharyya AK; Sharma RK; Agarwal A
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 19328484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Location of semen collection and semen quality: clinic-collected versus home-collected samples].
    Wang W; Zhong ZM; Su N; Peng YY; Huang TT
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Nov; 20(11):995-8. PubMed ID: 25577834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of a sperm quality analyser on semen of turkey breeders to monitor storage time effects and age-related changes during a reproductive cycle.
    Neuman SL; McDaniel CD; Frank L; Radu J; Hester PY
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 12195807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.