These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30425005)

  • 1. Lumbar Vertebrae Morphological Analysis and an Additional Approach for Vertebrae Identification in Lumbar Spine DXA Images.
    Guan W; Yu W; Lin Q; Zhang Z; Du G; Tian J; Xu Y; Hsieh E
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 30425005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?
    Salzmann SN; Shirahata T; Yang J; Miller CO; Carlson BB; Rentenberger C; Carrino JA; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 30343044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone Mineral Density T-Scores Derived from CT Attenuation Numbers (Hounsfield Units): Clinical Utility and Correlation with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.
    Hendrickson NR; Pickhardt PJ; Del Rio AM; Rosas HG; Anderson PA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2018; 38():25-31. PubMed ID: 30104921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-energy CT-based phantomless in vivo three-dimensional bone mineral density assessment of the lumbar spine.
    Wichmann JL; Booz C; Wesarg S; Kafchitsas K; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Lehnert T; Vogl TJ; Khan MF
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):778-84. PubMed ID: 24475863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Does Not Represent Bone Structure in Patients with Osteoporosis: A Comparison of Lumbar Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry with Vertebral Biopsies.
    Pumberger M; Palmowski Y; Strube P; Schwemmer C; Roll S; Zippelius T; Putzier M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Jul; 46(13):861-866. PubMed ID: 34100839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of routine thoracic and abdominal computed tomography scans for assessing bone mineral density and detecting osteoporosis.
    Marinova M; Edon B; Wolter K; Katsimbari B; Schild HH; Strunk HM
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2015; 31(10):1871-81. PubMed ID: 26308674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
    Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thoracic Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Can Sensitively Monitor Bone Mineral Metabolism: Comparison of Thoracic QCT vs Lumbar QCT and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Detection of Age-relative Change in Bone Mineral Density.
    Mao SS; Li D; Syed YS; Gao Y; Luo Y; Flores F; Child J; Cervantes M; Kalantar-Zadeh K; Budoff MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 28844601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of bone quality at the lumbar and sacral spine using CT scans: a retrospective feasibility study in 50 comparing CT and DXA data.
    Berger-Groch J; Thiesen DM; Ntalos D; Hennes F; Hartel MJ
    Eur Spine J; 2020 May; 29(5):1098-1104. PubMed ID: 31955257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Opportunistic use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to evaluate lumbar scoliosis.
    Schell TL; Krueger D; Binkley N; Hetzel S; Bernatz JT; Anderson PA
    Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):38. PubMed ID: 33624177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck.
    Di Paola M; Gatti D; Viapiana O; Cianferotti L; Cavalli L; Caffarelli C; Conversano F; Quarta E; Pisani P; Girasole G; Giusti A; Manfredini M; Arioli G; Matucci-Cerinic M; Bianchi G; Nuti R; Gonnelli S; Brandi ML; Muratore M; Rossini M
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Feb; 30(2):391-402. PubMed ID: 30178159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3-D Subject-Specific Shape and Density Estimation of the Lumbar Spine From a Single Anteroposterior DXA Image Including Assessment of Cortical and Trabecular Bone.
    Lopez Picazo M; Magallon Baro A; Del Rio Barquero LM; Di Gregorio S; Martelli Y; Romera J; Steghofer M; Gonzalez Ballester MA; Humbert L
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Dec; 37(12):2651-2662. PubMed ID: 29994113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the patient positioning during DXA measurements in daily clinical practice.
    Cetin A; Ozgüçlü E; Ozçakar L; Akinci A
    Clin Rheumatol; 2008 Jun; 27(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 17965906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphological changes of lumbar vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs associated with decrease in bone mineral density of the spine: a cross-sectional study in elderly subjects.
    Kwok AW; Wang YX; Griffith JF; Deng M; Leung JC; Ahuja AT; Leung PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(23):E1415-21. PubMed ID: 22914705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of the DXA Measurements in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Analysis of Over 1000 Patients.
    Bao J; Zou D; Li W
    Clin Interv Aging; 2021; 16():1131-1137. PubMed ID: 34168436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification evaluation of
    Huang K; Feng Y; Liu D; Liang W; Li L
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 31768820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
    Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Common Mistakes in the Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Turkey. A Retrospective Descriptive Multicenter Study.
    Karahan AY; Kaya B; Kuran B; Altındag O; Yildirim P; Dogan SC; Basaran A; Salbas E; Altınbilek T; Guler T; Tolu S; Hasbek Z; Ordahan B; Kaydok E; Yucel U; Yesilyurt S; Polat AD; Cubukcu M; Nas O; Sarp U; Yasar O; Kucuksarac S; Turkoglu G; Karadag A; Bagcaci S; Erol K; Guler E; Tuna S; Yildirim A; Karpuz S
    Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2016; 59(4):117-123. PubMed ID: 28440214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by routine CT in Southern Europe.
    Alacreu E; Moratal D; Arana E
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Mar; 28(3):983-990. PubMed ID: 28108802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.