149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30425586)
1. Bilateral salpingectomy versus bilateral partial salpingectomy during cesarean delivery.
Duncan JR; Jones HL; Hoffer SO; Schenone MH; Mari G
Int J Womens Health; 2018; 10():649-653. PubMed ID: 30425586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.
Shinar S; Blecher Y; Alpern S; Many A; Ashwal E; Amikam U; Cohen A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1185-1189. PubMed ID: 28285425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Salpingectomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Roeckner JT; Sawangkum P; Sanchez-Ramos L; Duncan JR
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 135(3):550-557. PubMed ID: 32080033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.
Ferrari F; Forte S; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Odicino F
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):373-376. PubMed ID: 30898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency and characteristics associated with opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery: A retrospective chart review.
Desravines N; Brenner T; Venkatesh K; Stuart G
Contraception; 2021 Mar; 103(3):203-207. PubMed ID: 33345975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Garcia C; Moskowitz OM; Chisholm CA; Duska LR; Warren AL; Lyons GR; Pettit KE
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29889755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complete salpingectomy versus tubal ligation during cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang M; Du Y; Hu Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Nov; 34(22):3794-3802. PubMed ID: 31752570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized controlled trial of 2 techniques of salpingectomy during cesarean delivery.
Lauterbach R; Gruenwald O; Matanes E; Justman N; Mor O; Vitner D; Avrahami R; Ghanem N; Zipori Y; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Nov; 4(6):100690. PubMed ID: 35843545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes.
Levy D; Casey S; Zemtsov G; Whiteside JL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):860-864. PubMed ID: 32745622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.
Lehn K; Gu L; Creinin MD; Chen MJ
Contraception; 2018 Sep; 98(3):232-236. PubMed ID: 29935148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.
Powell CB; Alabaster A; Simmons S; Garcia C; Martin M; McBride-Allen S; Littell RD
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):961-967. PubMed ID: 29016486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patients' perceptions toward and the driving factors of decision-making for opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean section.
Yassa M; Pulatoğlu Ç
Turk J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 17(2):115-122. PubMed ID: 32850186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risks and Benefits of Salpingectomy at the Time of Sterilization.
Castellano T; Zerden M; Marsh L; Boggess K
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2017 Nov; 72(11):663-668. PubMed ID: 29164264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial.
Ganer Herman H; Gluck O; Keidar R; Kerner R; Kovo M; Levran D; Bar J; Sagiv R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):472.e1-472.e6. PubMed ID: 28455082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mini-Laparoscopy for Removal (Partial) of Adnexae at the Time of Hysterectomy.
Setúbal AG; Alves JS; Lavado O; Faria J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):201-202. PubMed ID: 27856389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits and Risks of Bilateral Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Delivery for Permanent Postpartum Contraception.
Luke S; Addae-Konadu K; Davidson B; Kuller J; Dotters-Katz S
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2022 Mar; 77(3):167-173. PubMed ID: 35275215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.
Antosh DD; High R; Brown HW; Oliphant SS; Abed H; Philip N; Grimes CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):605.e1-605.e5. PubMed ID: 28734829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
