1154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30427952)
1. Evaluation of the 3D Augmented Reality-Guided Intraoperative Positioning of Dental Implants in Edentulous Mandibular Models.
Jiang W; Ma L; Zhang B; Fan Y; Qu X; Zhang X; Liao H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 30427952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel dental implant guided surgery based on integration of surgical template and augmented reality.
Lin YK; Yau HT; Wang IC; Zheng C; Chung KH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):543-53. PubMed ID: 23879701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel mixed reality-guided dental implant placement navigation system based on virtual-actual registration.
Fan X; Tao B; Tu P; Shen Y; Wu Y; Chen X
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Nov; 166():107560. PubMed ID: 37847946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Augmented reality surgical navigation with accurate CBCT-patient registration for dental implant placement.
Ma L; Jiang W; Zhang B; Qu X; Ning G; Zhang X; Liao H
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 29967935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A practical marker-less image registration method for augmented reality oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Wang J; Shen Y; Yang S
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 May; 14(5):763-773. PubMed ID: 30825070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method.
Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1530-5. PubMed ID: 24954760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement: a pilot study.
Ma L; Zhao Z; Chen F; Zhang B; Fu L; Liao H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2205-2215. PubMed ID: 28779275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Real-time in situ three-dimensional integral videography and surgical navigation using augmented reality: a pilot study.
Suenaga H; Hoang Tran H; Liao H; Masamune K; Dohi T; Hoshi K; Mori Y; Takato T
Int J Oral Sci; 2013 Jun; 5(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 23703710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-time augmented model guidance for mandibular proximal segment repositioning in orthognathic surgery, using electromagnetic tracking.
Lee SJ; Yang HJ; Choi MH; Woo SY; Huh KH; Lee SS; Heo MS; Choi SC; Hwang SJ; Yi WJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):127-137. PubMed ID: 30447987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study.
Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E
J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study.
Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-Assisted Dental Implant Placement Following Free Flap Reconstruction: Virtual Planning, CAD/CAM Templates, Dynamic Navigation and Augmented Reality.
Ochandiano S; García-Mato D; Gonzalez-Alvarez A; Moreta-Martinez R; Tousidonis M; Navarro-Cuellar C; Navarro-Cuellar I; Salmerón JI; Pascau J
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():754943. PubMed ID: 35155183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems.
Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Birkfellner W; Enislidis G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):785-90. PubMed ID: 17974114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A hybrid robotic system for zygomatic implant placement based on mixed reality navigation.
Fan X; Feng Y; Tao B; Shen Y; Wu Y; Chen X
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jun; 249():108156. PubMed ID: 38555744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A markerless automatic deformable registration framework for augmented reality navigation of laparoscopy partial nephrectomy.
Zhang X; Wang J; Wang T; Ji X; Shen Y; Sun Z; Zhang X
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Aug; 14(8):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 31016562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Augmented reality navigation with ultrasound-assisted point cloud registration for percutaneous ablation of liver tumors.
Ma L; Liang H; Han B; Yang S; Zhang X; Liao H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Sep; 17(9):1543-1552. PubMed ID: 35704238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible.
Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Stefanelli LV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1071-8. PubMed ID: 25216132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of virtually planned and conventionally placed implants in edentulous cadaver maxillae and mandibles: a preliminary report.
Gillot L; Cannas B; Friberg B; Vrielinck L; Rohner D; Pettersson A
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):798-804. PubMed ID: 24993376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real-time computer-generated integral imaging and 3D image calibration for augmented reality surgical navigation.
Wang J; Suenaga H; Liao H; Hoshi K; Yang L; Kobayashi E; Sakuma I
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Mar; 40():147-59. PubMed ID: 25465067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: A comparison of operator experience.
Rungcharassaeng K; Caruso JM; Kan JY; Schutyser F; Boumans T
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):407-13. PubMed ID: 26119019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
