These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30428700)

  • 1. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The "booty call": a compromise between men's and women's ideal mating strategies.
    Jonason PK; Li NP; Cason MJ
    J Sex Res; 2009; 46(5):460-70. PubMed ID: 19253133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.
    O'Connor JJ; Jones BC; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; Pisanski K; Feinberg DR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Positioning the booty-call relationship on the spectrum of relationships: sexual but more emotional than one-night stands.
    Jonason PK; Li NP; Richardson J
    J Sex Res; 2011 Sep; 48(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 20672215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):543-551. PubMed ID: 33057831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.
    Atari M
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(2):1474704917702459. PubMed ID: 28401792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The synergistic effect of prosociality and physical attractiveness on mate desirability.
    Ehlebracht D; Stavrova O; Fetchenhauer D; Farrelly D
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Aug; 109(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 29250771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.
    Mehmetoglu M; Määttänen I
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920979623. PubMed ID: 33371743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-Rated Attractiveness Moderates the Relationship Between Dark Personality Traits and Romantic Ideals in Women.
    Birkás B; Láng A; Meskó N
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Feb; 121(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 29298572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships.
    Gerlach TM; Arslan RC; Schultze T; Reinhard SK; Penke L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):313-330. PubMed ID: 28921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women's Mating Strategies and Mate Value Are Associated with Viewing Time to Facial Masculinity.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jul; 52(5):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 37245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex differences in relationship regret: the role of perceived mate characteristics.
    Coats S; Harrington JT; Beaubouef M; Locke H
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Jul; 10(3):422-42. PubMed ID: 22947670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
    Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of men's beauty and attractiveness by women with low sexual desire.
    Ferdenzi C; Delplanque S; Vorontsova-Wenger O; Pool E; Bianchi-Demicheli F; Sander D
    J Sex Med; 2015 Apr; 12(4):946-55. PubMed ID: 25496510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.
    Quist MC; Watkins CD; Smith FG; Little AC; Debruine LM; Jones BC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21882053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review.
    Gildersleeve K; Haselton MG; Fales MR
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Sep; 140(5):1205-59. PubMed ID: 24564172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.