931 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30428798)
21. Biomechanical comparison of modified Lim/Tsai tendon repairs with intra- and extra-tendinous knots.
Chang MK; Wong YR; Tay SC
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2018 Nov; 43(9):919-924. PubMed ID: 29690811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of a new 4-strand flexor tendon repair in a cadaveric porcine model.
Manchio JV; Shashikant MP; Shrivastava A; Weinzweig J; Vernadakis AJ
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 34(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 19058923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effects of multiple-strand suture techniques on the tensile properties of repair of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon to bone.
Silva MJ; Hollstien SB; Fayazi AH; Adler P; Gelberman RH; Boyer MI
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Oct; 80(10):1507-14. PubMed ID: 9801219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical investigation of uneven load bearing in six-strand Lim-Tsai flexor tendon repair using FiberLoop
Hay RAS; Wong YR; Loke AM; Tay SC
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2017 Jun; 42(5):457-461. PubMed ID: 28488452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of a multifilament stainless steel suture with FiberWire for flexor tendon repairs--an in vitro biomechanical study.
McDonald E; Gordon JA; Buckley JM; Gordon L
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2013 May; 38(4):418-23. PubMed ID: 22745156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A cyclic testing comparison of two flexor tendon repairs: asymmetric and modified Lim-Tsai techniques.
Lim RQR; Wong YR; Loke AMK; Tay SC
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2018 Jun; 43(5):494-498. PubMed ID: 29458309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The suture loop holding capacity of flexor digitorum profundus tendon within and outside the digital tendon sheath.
Havulinna J; Leppänen OV; Göransson H
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2013 Sep; 38(7):801-4. PubMed ID: 23315625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Barbed Sutures in Porcine Flexor Tenorrhaphy.
Sull A; Inceoglu S; August A; Gregorius S; Wongworawat MD
Hand (N Y); 2016 Dec; 11(4):475-478. PubMed ID: 28149217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of modified Kessler tendon suture at different levels in the human flexor digitorum profundus tendon and porcine flexors and porcine extensors: an experimental biomechanical study.
Havulinna J; Leppänen OV; Järvinen TL; Göransson H
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2011 Oct; 36(8):670-6. PubMed ID: 21816887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of a knotless flexor tendon repair using a multifilament stainless steel cable-crimp system.
Gordon L; Matsui J; McDonald E; Gordon JA; Neimkin R
J Hand Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 38(4):677-83. PubMed ID: 23453895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Gliding resistance after repair of partially lacerated human flexor digitorum profundus tendon in vitro.
Zhao C; Amadio PC; Zobitz ME; Momose T; Couvreur P; An KN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Oct; 16(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11535351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: a comparative biomechanical study.
Alavanja G; Dailey E; Mass DP
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15925150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical study of cross-locked cruciate versus Strickland flexor tendon repair.
Vigler M; Palti R; Goldstein R; Patel VP; Nasser P; Lee SK
J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 33(10):1826-33. PubMed ID: 19084186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of barbed suture tendon repair on work of flexion.
Ben-Amotz O; Kargel J; Mailey B; Sammer DM
J Hand Surg Am; 2015 May; 40(5):969-74. PubMed ID: 25817753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A biomechanical comparison of 3 loop suture materials in a 6-strand flexor tendon repair technique.
Gan AW; Neo PY; He M; Yam AK; Chong AK; Tay SC
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1830-4. PubMed ID: 22857910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Two-, four-, and six-strand zone II flexor tendon repairs: an in situ biomechanical comparison using a cadaver model.
Thurman RT; Trumble TE; Hanel DP; Tencer AF; Kiser PK
J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Mar; 23(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 9556266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical Analysis of Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair With a Coupler Device Versus Locking Cruciate Core Suture.
Irwin CS; Parks BG; Means KR
J Hand Surg Am; 2020 Sep; 45(9):878.e1-878.e6. PubMed ID: 32276814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Flexor tendon repair: a comparative study between a knotless barbed suture repair and a traditional four-strand monofilament suture repair.
Joyce CW; Whately KE; Chan JC; Murphy M; O'Brien FJ; Carroll SM
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2014 Jan; 39(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 23695149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A biomechanical study of Tang's multiple locking techniques for flexor tendon repair.
Tang JB; Pan CZ; Xie RG; Chen F
Chir Main; 1999; 18(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 10855328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Zone II tendon repairs augmented with autogenous dorsal tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis.
Slade JF; Bhargava M; Barrie KA; Shenbagamurthi D; Wolfe SW
J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 26(5):813-20. PubMed ID: 11561232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
