168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30429965)
1. Is Articaine More Potent than Mepivacaine for Use in Oral Surgery?
Gazal G
J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2018; 9(3):e5. PubMed ID: 30429965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double-blind crossover study.
Gazal G; Alharbi AM; Al-Samadani KH; Kanaa MD
Saudi J Anaesth; 2015; 9(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 26543456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions.
Gazal G; Alharbi R; Fareed WM; Omar E; Alolayan AB; Al-Zoubi H; Alnazzawi AA
Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(2):152-157. PubMed ID: 28442952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of speed of action and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for pulpal anesthesia in mandibular teeth: A randomized, double-blind cross-over trial.
Gazal G
Eur J Dent; 2015; 9(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 26038650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth.
Gazal G
Saudi J Anaesth; 2020; 14(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 32934619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is prilocaine safe and potent enough for use in the oral surgery of medically compromised patients.
Gazal G
Saudi Med J; 2019 Jan; 40(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 30617388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of equivalent doses of lidocaine and articaine in maxillary posterior tooth extractions: case series.
Friedl CC; Bashutski J; Rashidi N
J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2012; 3(2):e4. PubMed ID: 24422011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% mepivacaine in mandibular third molar germectomy using different anaesthetic techniques: a split-mouth clinical trial.
Menditti D; Boccellino M; Nucci L; Ribeiro Sobrinho AP; Marotta A; Angrisani P; Cantore S; Menditti M; Vitiello A; DI Domenico M; Rinaldi B; DE Rosa A
Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Feb; 72(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 36847742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study.
Dhake P; Nagpal D; Chaudhari P; Lamba G; Hotwani K; Singh P
J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2022 Oct; 22(5):387-394. PubMed ID: 36246033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine with Buccal and Palatal Infiltration of 2% Lignocaine for the Extraction of Maxillary Premolar Teeth.
Sandilya V; Andrade NN; Mathai PC; Aggarwal N; Sahu V; Nerurkar S
Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(2):284-288. PubMed ID: 32308291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1
Kumar DP; Sharma M; Patil V; Subedar RS; Lakshmi GV; Manjunath NV
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2019; 9(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 31909001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
Majid OW; Ahmed AM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and safety of articaine in 3-year-old children for dental procedures: a protocol for a clinical randomised control trial in Saudi Arabia.
Alrashdi M; Alhunti A; Almansour A
BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e077751. PubMed ID: 37865418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial.
Rayati F; Haeri M; Norouziha A; Jabbarian R
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 59(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 34053801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Yang F; Gao Y; Zhang L; Zheng B; Wang L; Sun H; Huang D
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.
Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine.
Somuri AV; Rai AB; Pillai M
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Jun; 12(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 24431829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Efficacy Between Articaine and Lignocaine in Simultaneous Bilateral Orthodontic Maxillary Premolar Extractions: A Split-Mouth Comparative Study.
Krishna S; Bhaskaran R; Kumar SP; Krishnan M
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50078. PubMed ID: 38192927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
