170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30430540)
1. Exact inference on the random-effects model for meta-analyses with few studies.
Michael H; Thornton S; Xie M; Tian L
Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30430540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
Preuß M; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta-analysis.
Noma H; Nagashima K; Furukawa TA
Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):337-347. PubMed ID: 31399994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exact inference for the random-effect model for meta-analyses with rare events.
Gronsbell J; Hong C; Nie L; Lu Y; Tian L
Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(3):252-264. PubMed ID: 31820458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Approximate confidence intervals for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis.
Jackson D; Bowden J; Baker R
Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 26287958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies.
Röver C; Knapp G; Friede T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Nov; 15():99. PubMed ID: 26573817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
Bom PRD; Rachinger H
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta-analysis.
Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4531-43. PubMed ID: 17397112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of studies with missing data.
Yuan Y; Little RJ
Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):487-96. PubMed ID: 18565168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Viechtbauer W
Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncertainty of the time of first significance in random effects cumulative meta-analysis.
Berkey CS; Mosteller F; Lau J; Antman EM
Control Clin Trials; 1996 Oct; 17(5):357-71. PubMed ID: 8932970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian estimation in random effects meta-analysis using a non-informative prior.
Bodnar O; Link A; Arendacká B; Possolo A; Elster C
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):378-399. PubMed ID: 27790722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Misunderstandings about Q and 'Cochran's Q test' in meta-analysis.
Hoaglin DC
Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):485-95. PubMed ID: 26303773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The exact distribution of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic in one-way random effects meta-analysis.
Biggerstaff BJ; Jackson D
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6093-110. PubMed ID: 18781561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
Partlett C; Riley RD
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalised Cochran heterogeneity statistics.
Jackson D
Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 26053842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
