These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30430684)

  • 41. Differences in multi-echo chemical shift encoded MRI proton density fat fraction estimation based on multifrequency fat peaks selection in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients.
    Martí-Aguado D; Alberich-Bayarri Á; Martín-Rodríguez JL; França M; García-Castro F; González-Cantero J; González-Cantero Á; Martí-Bonmatí L
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Nov; 75(11):880.e5-880.e12. PubMed ID: 32888653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic steatosis: Validation in ex vivo human livers.
    Bannas P; Kramer H; Hernando D; Agni R; Cunningham AM; Mandal R; Motosugi U; Sharma SD; Munoz del Rio A; Fernandez L; Reeder SB
    Hepatology; 2015 Nov; 62(5):1444-55. PubMed ID: 26224591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reference Values for Water-Specific T1 of the Liver at 3 T: T2*-Compensation and the Confounding Effects of Fat.
    Thompson RB; Sherrington R; Beaulieu C; Kirkham A; Paterson DI; Seres P; Grenier J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Nov; 60(5):2063-2075. PubMed ID: 38305588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Free-breathing quantification of hepatic fat in healthy children and children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease using a multi-echo 3-D stack-of-radial MRI technique.
    Armstrong T; Ly KV; Murthy S; Ghahremani S; Kim GHJ; Calkins KL; Wu HH
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Jul; 48(7):941-953. PubMed ID: 29728744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A Pilot Comparative Study of Quantitative Ultrasound, Conventional Ultrasound, and MRI for Predicting Histology-Determined Steatosis Grade in Adult Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Paige JS; Bernstein GS; Heba E; Costa EAC; Fereirra M; Wolfson T; Gamst AC; Valasek MA; Lin GY; Han A; Erdman JW; O'Brien WD; Andre MP; Loomba R; Sirlin CB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):W168-W177. PubMed ID: 28267360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Magnitude-intrinsic water-fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method.
    Triay Bagur A; Hutton C; Irving B; Gyngell ML; Robson MD; Brady M
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jul; 82(1):460-475. PubMed ID: 30874334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of chemical shift-encoded water-fat MRI and MR spectroscopy in quantification of marrow fat in postmenopausal females.
    Li G; Xu Z; Gu H; Li X; Yuan W; Chang S; Fan J; Calimente H; Hu J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 27341545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of noise and estimator type on bias for analysis of liver proton density fat fraction.
    Lawrence EM; Roberts NT; Hernando D; Mao L; Reeder SB
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec; 74():244-249. PubMed ID: 33011211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Measurement of spleen fat on MRI-proton density fat fraction arises from reconstruction of noise.
    Hong CW; Hamilton G; Hooker C; Park CC; Tran CA; Henderson WC; Hooker JC; Fazeli Dehkordy S; Schwimmer JB; Reeder SB; Sirlin CB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3295-3303. PubMed ID: 31172210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Standardized Approach for ROI-Based Measurements of Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* in the Liver.
    Campo CA; Hernando D; Schubert T; Bookwalter CA; Pay AJV; Reeder SB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):592-603. PubMed ID: 28705058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparison of liver fat content as determined by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction and MRS versus liver histology in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
    Idilman IS; Keskin O; Celik A; Savas B; Elhan AH; Idilman R; Karcaaltincaba M
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Mar; 57(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 25855666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Point-of-care magnetic resonance technology to measure liver fat: Phantom and first-in-human pilot study.
    Barahman M; Grunvald E; Prado PJ; Bussandri A; Henderson WC; Wolfson T; Fowler KJ; Sirlin CB
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Oct; 88(4):1794-1805. PubMed ID: 35611691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of multi-echo Dixon sequence in quantification of hepatic steatosis in Chinese children and adolescents.
    Zhao YZ; Gan YG; Zhou JL; Liu JQ; Cao WG; Cheng SM; Bai DM; Wang MZ; Gao FQ; Zhou SM
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(12):1513-1523. PubMed ID: 30948914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quantification of liver fat with respiratory-gated quantitative chemical shift encoded MRI.
    Motosugi U; Hernando D; Bannas P; Holmes JH; Wang K; Shimakawa A; Iwadate Y; Taviani V; Rehm JL; Reeder SB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Nov; 42(5):1241-8. PubMed ID: 25828696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Three-dimensional analysis of pancreatic fat by fat-water magnetic resonance imaging provides detailed characterization of pancreatic steatosis with improved reproducibility.
    Kato S; Iwasaki A; Kurita Y; Arimoto J; Yamamoto T; Hasegawa S; Sato T; Imajo K; Hosono K; Kobayashi N; Yoneda M; Higurashi T; Kubota K; Utsunomiya D; Nakajima A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0224921. PubMed ID: 31790429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. iATT liver fat quantification for steatosis grading by referring to MRI proton density fat fraction: a multicenter study.
    Hirooka M; Ogawa S; Koizumi Y; Yoshida Y; Goto T; Yasuda S; Yamahira M; Tamai T; Kuromatsu R; Matsuzaki T; Suehiro T; Kamada Y; Sumida Y; Hiasa Y; Toyoda H; Kumada T
    J Gastroenterol; 2024 Jun; 59(6):504-514. PubMed ID: 38553657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Chemical shift-encoded MRI with compressed sensing combined with parallel imaging for proton density fat fraction measurement of the lumbar vertebral bone marrow.
    Misaka T; Hashimoto Y; Ashikaga R; Ishida T
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Apr; 103(15):e37748. PubMed ID: 38608106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reproducibility of hepatic MR elastography across field strengths, pulse sequences, scan intervals, and readers.
    Kim HJ; Kim B; Yu HJ; Huh J; Lee JH; Lee SS; Kim KW; Kim JK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 31720766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Multisite multivendor validation of a quantitative MRI and CT compatible fat phantom.
    Zhao R; Hernando D; Harris DT; Hinshaw LA; Li K; Ananthakrishnan L; Bashir MR; Duan X; Ghasabeh MA; Kamel IR; Lowry C; Mahesh M; Marin D; Miller J; Pickhardt PJ; Shaffer J; Yokoo T; Brittain JH; Reeder SB
    Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4375-4386. PubMed ID: 34105167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of fatty pancreas by proton density fat fraction using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and its association with pancreatic cancer.
    Fukui H; Hori M; Fukuda Y; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Ota T; Ogawa K; Ninomiya K; Tatsumi M; Osuga K; Yamada D; Eguchi H; Miyoshi E; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():25-31. PubMed ID: 31439250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.