224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30431390)
1. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Shows Promising Outcomes Compared to Laparotomy, a National Cancer Database Observational Analysis.
Skancke M; Schoolfield C; Umapathi B; Amdur R; Brody F; Obias V
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30431390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
Merchea A; Ali SM; Kelley SR; Duchalais E; Alabbad JY; Dozois EJ; Larson DW
J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Aug; 22(8):1412-1417. PubMed ID: 29594912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive surgery for T4 colon cancer is associated with better outcomes compared to open surgery in the National Cancer Database.
El-Sharkawy F; Gushchin V; Plerhoples TA; Liu C; Emery EL; Collins DT; Bijelic L
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Apr; 47(4):818-827. PubMed ID: 32951935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally Invasive Staging Surgery in Women with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.
Bregar AJ; Melamed A; Diver E; Clemmer JT; Uppal S; Schorge JO; Rice LW; Del Carmen MG; Rauh-Hain JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1677-1687. PubMed ID: 28074326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.
de'Angelis N; Landi F; Vitali GC; Memeo R; Martínez-Pérez A; Solis A; Assalino M; Vallribera F; Mercoli HA; Marescaux J; Mutter D; Ris F; Espin E; Brunetti F
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3106-3121. PubMed ID: 27826780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defining the Role of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Jafari MD; Gahagan JV; Inaba CS; Koh CY; Mills SD; Carmichael JC; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
Ann Surg; 2017 Oct; 266(4):574-581. PubMed ID: 28650357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic staging for apparent stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
Melamed A; Keating NL; Clemmer JT; Bregar AJ; Wright JD; Boruta DM; Schorge JO; Del Carmen MG; Rauh-Hain JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):50.e1-50.e12. PubMed ID: 27567562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased Lymph Node Yield Is Associated With Improved Survival in Rectal Cancer Irrespective of Neoadjuvant Treatment: Results From a National Cohort Study.
Lykke J; Jess P; Roikjaer O;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Sep; 58(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 26252843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience.
Greenleaf EK; Sun SX; Hollenbeak CS; Wong J
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Mar; 20(2):368-378. PubMed ID: 26961133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is achievable and offers advantages as a minimally invasive surgery over the open approach.
Nagayoshi K; Ueki T; Manabe T; Moriyama T; Yanai K; Oda Y; Tanaka M
Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1938-47. PubMed ID: 26275538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
