These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30431580)

  • 1. Comparison of clinical outcomes between cystotome-assisted prechop phacoemulsification surgery and conventional phacoemulsification surgery for hard nucleus cataracts: A CONSORT-compliant article.
    Li X; He Y; Su T; Tian Y; Wang Y; Xia X; Song W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(46):e13124. PubMed ID: 30431580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of clinical outcomes between cystotome-assisted prechop phacoemulsification surgery and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for hard nucleus cataracts.
    He Y; Wang C; Zhou X; Peng J; Zhang X; Wang Y; Rui Y; Zhang C; Zhang W; Feng L; Dai S; Xia X; Song W
    Eye (Lond); 2023 Feb; 37(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 35091707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the selected parameters of the anterior segment of the eye between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, microincision cataract surgery, and conventional phacoemulsification: A case-control study.
    Chlasta-Twardzik E; Nowińska A; Wylęgała E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Dec; 98(52):e18340. PubMed ID: 31876707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central corneal thickness changes following manual small incision cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification for white cataract.
    Kongsap P
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2019; 63(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 31198899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the Curative Effects between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery and Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
    Chen X; Chen K; He J; Yao K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152088. PubMed ID: 26999612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification for cataract patients with high myopia.
    Zhao L; Tan M; Zhang J; Hao M; Liang S; Ji M; Guan H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2024 Jun; 50(6):624-630. PubMed ID: 38350159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and manual phacoemusification: a six-month follow-up.
    Yu Y; Chen X; Hua H; Wu M; Lai K; Yao K
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 44(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 26716428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification on corneal endothelium and prognosis of diabetic patients with cataract with different nuclear hardness].
    Yang XW; Gao Y; Jiang YQ; Zhou YJ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Jun; 60(6):511-517. PubMed ID: 38825950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery for hard nuclear cataracts.
    Chen X; Yu Y; Song X; Zhu Y; Wang W; Yao K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Apr; 43(4):486-491. PubMed ID: 28532933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corneal endothelial changes following cataract surgery in hard nuclear cataract: Randomized trial comparing phacoemulsification to manual small-incision cataract surgery.
    Singh R; Sharma AK; Katiyar V; Kumar G; Gupta SK
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 70(11):3904-3909. PubMed ID: 36308124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comparison between torsional and conventional mode phacoemulsification in moderate and hard cataracts.
    Kim DH; Wee WR; Lee JH; Kim MK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):336-40. PubMed ID: 21165231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endothelial cell loss and refractive predictability in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery.
    Krarup T; Holm LM; la Cour M; Kjaerbo H
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 92(7):617-22. PubMed ID: 24888390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
    Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: Long-term outcomes.
    Fan W; Yan H; Zhang G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Jul; 44(7):864-870. PubMed ID: 29958766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification for complex cataracts in vitrectomized eyes.
    Cai L; Ma D; Xu X; Han X; Qiu X; Lu Y; Yang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1381-1387. PubMed ID: 36449671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery.
    Roberts HW; Wagh VK; Sullivan DL; Hidzheva P; Detesan DI; Heemraz BS; Sparrow JM; O'Brart DPS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jan; 45(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 30413333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endothelial cell loss: Biaxial small-incision torsional phacoemulsification versus biaxial small-incision longitudinal phacoemulsification.
    Gonen T; Sever O; Horozoglu F; Yasar M; Keskinbora KH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1918-24. PubMed ID: 22980723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of changes in corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness between conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: a randomised, controlled clinical trial.
    Dzhaber D; Mustafa O; Alsaleh F; Mihailovic A; Daoud YJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 104(2):225-229. PubMed ID: 31097441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus 2.2 mm clear corneal phacoemulsification.
    Ranjini H; Murthy PR; Murthy GJ; Murthy VR
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 65(10):942-948. PubMed ID: 29044058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central corneal thickness assessment after phacoemulsification: Subluxation versus Divide-and-Conquer.
    Jeancolas AL; Lhuillier L; Renaudin L; Boiche M; Ghetemme C; Goetz C; Ouamara N; Perone JM
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Nov; 40(9):744-750. PubMed ID: 29050928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.