These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3043251)

  • 1. Improvement of IVDSA of the brachiocephalic arteries using a non-ionic contrast medium.
    Thijssen HO; Merx JL; Thijssen MA; Keyser A; Schoonderwaldt H; Wong Chung R
    Neuroradiology; 1988; 30(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 3043251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).
    Karle A; Fries J; Laulund S; Andrew E
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Kieffer SA
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of brachiocephalic angiography and IVDSA in the same group of patients.
    Thijssen HO; Merx JL; Mostart JE; Thijssen MA; Chung RW; Schoonderwaldt H; Keyser A
    Neuroradiology; 1988; 30(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 3290698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography: effect of dose and administration mode of contrast medium, and comparison with direct ventriculography].
    Kuribayashi S; Ootaki M; Matsuyama S; Kanemoto N; Furuya H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Sep; 15(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 3915507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is nonionic isotonic iohexol the contrast agent of choice for quantitative myocardial videodensitometry?
    Pijls NH; Bos HS; Uijen GJ; Van der Werf T
    Int J Card Imaging; 1988; 3(2-3):117-26. PubMed ID: 3049843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Iohexol compared to urografin meglumine in cerebral angiography. A randomized, double blind cross-over study.
    Ahlgren P
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 7121808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reaction to contrast media in contrast-enhanced CT of the brain. A comparative investigation of non-ionic ultravist and ionic urografin-meglumin.
    Jensen PR; Owre A; Ahlgren P
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):144-6. PubMed ID: 2806269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of iohexol and diatrizoate-meglumine in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.
    Pelech AN; Allard SM; Hurd RT; Giddins NG; Collins GF
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 1885274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pain in peripheral arteriography: an assessment of conventional versus ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Murphy G; Campbell DR; Fraser DB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1988 Jun; 39(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 2967829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A controlled clinical trial of iohexol and diatrizoate in aortofemoral angiography.
    Egsgaard H; Hørup A; Praestholm J
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 Feb; 3(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 6341063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Omnipaque and Urografin in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. A randomised, double blind study.
    Folke K; Andrew E; Laulund S; Hansen PF
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Apr; 58(688):319-23. PubMed ID: 3904899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media versus iohexol.
    Wolf GL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():166-70. PubMed ID: 6382932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of meglumine sodium diatrizoate, iopamidol, and iohexol for coronary angiography and ventriculography.
    Murdock CJ; Davis MJ; Ireland MA; Gibbons FA; Cope GD
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Mar; 19(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 2180577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast media tonicity. Part II. Isotonic ioxaglate vs. standard renografin for IV-DSA evaluation of the carotid bifurcation, a double-blind prospective clinical trial.
    Burbank FH; Bradley BR; Yegnashankaran S; Enzmann DR
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 3516921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.