These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. A prospective comparison of four insanity defense standards. Wettstein RM; Mulvey EP; Rogers R Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Jan; 148(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 1984702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Insanity findings and evaluation practices: A state-wide review of court-ordered reports. O Gardner B; C Murrie D; N Torres A Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):303-316. PubMed ID: 29722059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Insanity plea: predicting not guilty by reason of insanity adjudications. Jeffrey RW; Pasewark RA; Bieber S Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3365477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Factors associated with a successful insanity plea. Steadman HJ; Keitner L; Braff J; Arvanites TM Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Apr; 140(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 6837773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Schizotypal personality disorder and the insanity defense. Felthous AR J Forensic Sci; 1986 Jul; 31(3):1016-22. PubMed ID: 3734726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Two year's experience under Utah's mens rea insanity law. Heinbecker P Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 3730630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Introducing a standard of legal insanity: The case of Sweden compared to The Netherlands. Radovic S; Meynen G; Bennet T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():43-9. PubMed ID: 26003234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [The spider on the ceiling]. Viau R Sante Ment Que; 1990 Nov; 15(2):47-72. PubMed ID: 2094496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part IV: The insanity defense and the Ultimate Issue Rule. Goldstein RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 2790225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome. Janofsky JS; Vandewalle MB; Rappeport JR Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2758121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The negligible effects of California's 1982 reform of the insanity defense test. McGreevy MA; Steadman HJ; Callahan LA Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Jun; 148(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 2035715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. An empirical investigation of insanity defense attitudes: exploring factors related to bias. Bloechl AL; Vitacco MJ; Neumann CS; Erickson SE Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 17166589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: scale construction and validation. Daftary-Kapur T; Groscup JL; O'Connor M; Coffaro F; Galietta M Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(1):40-63. PubMed ID: 21264924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The military insanity defense. Lande RG Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 1873574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The unconditional release of mentally ill offenders from indefinite commitment: a study of Missouri insanity acquittees. Linhorst DM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):563-79. PubMed ID: 10638784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]