These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3043872)

  • 1. New and old contrast agents: pharmacology, tissue opacification, and excretory urography.
    Spataro RF
    Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 3043872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent.
    Spataro RF; Katzberg RW; Fischer HW; McMannis MJ
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 3538156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of urography and renal clearance of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Thomsen HS; Vestergaard A; Dorph S
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan; 27(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1733879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iopamidol: new, nonionic contrast agent for excretory urography.
    Thompson WM; Foster WL; Halvorsen RA; Dunnick NR; Rommel AJ; Bates M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb; 142(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 6607602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the image quality of intravenous urograms using low-osmolar contrast media.
    Kaye B; Howard J; Foord KD; Cumberland DC
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):589-91. PubMed ID: 3408846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unequal doses of ioversol versus diatrizoate for urography.
    Baker MK; Kopecky KK; Bogan M; Wass JL
    Urol Radiol; 1990; 12(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 2281582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Newer contrast agents for urography.
    Spataro RF
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1984 Jun; 22(2):365-80. PubMed ID: 6205415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximizing opacification during excretory urography: effect of low-osmolarity contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1992 Apr; 43(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 1373337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Swanson DP; Thrall JH; Shetty PC
    Clin Pharm; 1986 Nov; 5(11):877-91. PubMed ID: 3780159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plasma osmolality, iodine concentration and urographic images following high and low osmolar contrast media.
    Todd AW; Naisby GP; Owen JP; Smith PA; Butler TJ; Kelly PJ; Murthy LN; Robson JY; Laker MF
    Clin Radiol; 1991 May; 43(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 2036759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Urography with low-osmolality contrast media: comparative urinary excretion of Iopamidol, Hexabrix, and diatrizoate.
    Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Boylan L
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 7141831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
    Lovett I; Benn I; Benness G; Doust B
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
    Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK
    Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats.
    Agut A; Murciano J; Sanchez-Valverde MA; Laredo FG; Tovar MC
    Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 10425244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urography with a low osmolality contrast agent. Comparison of Hexabrix with Conray 325.
    McClennan BL; Ling D; Rholl KS; James M
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Feb; 21(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 3957588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urine profiles and kidney histology after intravenous injection of ionic and nonionic radiologic and magnetic resonance contrast media in normal rats.
    Thomsen HS; Dorph S; Larsen S; Horn T; Hemmingsen L; Skaarup P; Golman K; Svendsen O
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Oct; 1(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 9419476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tissue fluid shifts during renal arteriography with conventional and low osmolality agents.
    Morris TW; Harnish PP; Reece K; Katzberg RW
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 6618823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative effects of nonionic (iopamidol) and ionic (sodium and meglumine diatrizoate) contrast media for urography on urinary excretion of water and solutes.
    Garibotto G; Saffioti S; Garlaschi G; Gambaro A; Satragno L; Cittadini G
    Urol Radiol; 1986; 8(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 3798605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.