153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30440283)
1. Virtual reality for activities of daily living training in neurorehabilitation: a usability and feasibility study in healthy participants.
Gerber SM; Muri RM; Mosimann UP; Nef T; Urwyler P
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():1-4. PubMed ID: 30440283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual Reality as a Therapy Tool for Walking Activities in Pediatric Neurorehabilitation: Usability and User Experience Evaluation.
Ammann-Reiffer C; Kläy A; Keller U
JMIR Serious Games; 2022 Jul; 10(3):e38509. PubMed ID: 35834316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the usability of an immersive virtual reality grocery store in healthy controls.
Flash S; Goldsmith DM; Nelson TL; Thompson W; Flatley Brennan P
Int J Med Inform; 2024 Jul; 187():105458. PubMed ID: 38648684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility and usability of a new home-based immersive virtual reality headset-based dexterity training in multiple sclerosis.
Kamm CP; Blättler R; Kueng R; Vanbellingen T
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2023 Mar; 71():104525. PubMed ID: 36738693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immersive 3D Virtual Reality Cancellation Task for Visual Neglect Assessment: A Pilot Study.
Knobel SEJ; Kaufmann BC; Gerber SM; Cazzoli D; Müri RM; Nyffeler T; Nef T
Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():180. PubMed ID: 32528265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual Reality for the Assessment of Everyday Cognitive Functions in Older Adults: An Evaluation of the Virtual Reality Action Test and Two Interaction Devices in a 91-Year-Old Woman.
Chirico A; Giovannetti T; Neroni P; Simone S; Gallo L; Galli F; Giancamilli F; Predazzi M; Lucidi F; De Pietro G; Giordano A
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():123. PubMed ID: 32116928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rehabilitation of activities of daily living in virtual environments with intuitive user interface and force feedback.
Chiang VC; Lo KH; Choi KS
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Oct; 12(7):672-680. PubMed ID: 27782750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of the efficacy of collaborative virtual reality systems for moderated remote usability testing.
Chalil Madathil K; Greenstein JS
Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():501-514. PubMed ID: 28256209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Desktop VR Is Better Than Non-ambulatory HMD VR for Spatial Learning.
Srivastava P; Rimzhim A; Vijay P; Singh S; Chandra S
Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():50. PubMed ID: 33501066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immersive virtual reality technology in a three-dimensional virtual simulated store: Investigating telepresence and usability.
Schnack A; Wright MJ; Holdershaw JL
Food Res Int; 2019 Mar; 117():40-49. PubMed ID: 30736922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of visual fatigue caused by head-mounted display for virtual reality and two-dimensional display using objective and subjective evaluation.
Hirota M; Kanda H; Endo T; Miyoshi T; Miyagawa S; Hirohara Y; Yamaguchi T; Saika M; Morimoto T; Fujikado T
Ergonomics; 2019 Jun; 62(6):759-766. PubMed ID: 30773103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can serious play and clinical cognitive assessment go together? On the feasibility and user-experience of virtual reality simulations in paediatric neurorehabilitation.
Verheul F; Gosselt I; Spreij L; Visser-Meily A; Te Winkel S; Rentinck I; Nijboer T
J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2022; 15(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 35661025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the usability of a virtual reality manual wheelchair simulator in two display conditions.
Alapakkam Govindarajan MA; Archambault PS; Laplante-El Haili Y
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng; 2022; 9():20556683211067174. PubMed ID: 35237445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the Performance of Gesture-Based Input for Mid-Air Text Entry in a Virtual Environment: A Comparison of Hand-Up versus Hand-Down Postures.
Wang Y; Wang Y; Chen J; Wang Y; Yang J; Jiang T; He J
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 33668275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility and user-experience of virtual reality in neuropsychological assessment following stroke.
Spreij LA; Visser-Meily JMA; Sibbel J; Gosselt IK; Nijboer TCW
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2022 May; 32(4):499-519. PubMed ID: 33138703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning real-life cognitive abilities in a novel 360°-virtual reality supermarket: a neuropsychological study of healthy participants and patients with epilepsy.
Grewe P; Kohsik A; Flentge D; Dyck E; Botsch M; Winter Y; Markowitsch HJ; Bien CG; Piefke M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 10():42. PubMed ID: 23618596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Hand Tracking in Immersive Virtual Reality for Memory Assessment.
Varela-Aldás J; Buele J; López I; Palacios-Navarro G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of body visualization on performance in head-mounted display virtual reality.
Pastel S; Chen CH; Petri K; Witte K
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239226. PubMed ID: 32956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usability Comparisons of Head-Mounted vs. Stereoscopic Desktop Displays in a Virtual Reality Environment with Pain Patients.
Tong X; Gromala D; Gupta D; Squire P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():424-31. PubMed ID: 27046617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hands-Free User Interface for VR Headsets Based on In Situ Facial Gesture Sensing.
Kim J; Cha J; Kim S
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33339247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
