These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30440536)

  • 1. Comparison of 3D reconstruction methods based on different cardiovascular imaging: a study of multimodality reconstruction method.
    Tsompou PI; Sakellarios AI; Siogkas PK; Andrikos IO; Kigka VI; Lemos PA; Michalis LK; Fotiadis DI
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():899-902. PubMed ID: 30440536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of three multimodality coronary 3D reconstruction methods.
    Tsompou PI; Siogkas PK; Sakellarios AI; Andrikos IO; Kigka VI; Lemos PA; Michalis LK; Fotiadis DI
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5812-5815. PubMed ID: 31947173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study.
    Voros S; Rinehart S; Qian Z; Vazquez G; Anderson H; Murrieta L; Wilmer C; Carlson H; Taylor K; Ballard W; Karmpaliotis D; Kalynych A; Brown C
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Feb; 4(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 21349459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
    Tu S; Xu L; Ligthart J; Xu B; Witberg K; Sun Z; Koning G; Reiber JH; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22261998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
    Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of angiographic and IVUS derived coronary geometric reconstructions for evaluation of the association of hemodynamics with coronary artery disease progression.
    Timmins LH; Suo J; Eshtehardi P; Molony DS; McDaniel MC; Oshinski JN; Giddens DP; Samady H
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1327-1336. PubMed ID: 27229349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.
    Spoon DB; Rubinshtein R; Psaltis PJ; Sandhu GS; Lennon R; Rihal CS; Lerman A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 81(7):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23436576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implications of computed tomography reconstruction algorithms on coronary atheroma quantification: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Ramasamy A; Hamid A Khan A; Cooper J; Simon J; Maurovich-Horvat P; Bajaj R; Kitslaar P; Amersey R; Jain A; Deaner A; Reiber JH; Moon JC; Dijkstra J; Serruys PW; Mathur A; Baumbach A; Torii R; Pugliese F; Bourantas CV
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2023; 17(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 36270952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound for functional assessment of coronary lesions.
    Nishi T; Kitahara H; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Sugimoto K; Takahara M; Kobayashi Y
    J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):280-286. PubMed ID: 27293021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angiographic derived endothelial shear stress: a new predictor of atherosclerotic disease progression.
    Bourantas CV; Ramasamy A; Karagiannis A; Sakellarios A; Zanchin T; Yamaji K; Ueki Y; Shen X; Fotiadis DI; Michalis LK; Mathur A; Serruys PW; Garcia-Garcia HM; Koskinas K; Torii R; Windecker S; Räber L
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 20(3):314-322. PubMed ID: 30020435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
    Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
    Porto I; Dato I; Todaro D; Calabrese M; Rigattieri S; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Burzotta F; Trani C; Crea F
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D fusion of intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography for in-vivo wall shear stress analysis: a feasibility study.
    van der Giessen AG; Schaap M; Gijsen FJ; Groen HC; van Walsum T; Mollet NR; Dijkstra J; van de Vosse FN; Niessen WJ; de Feyter PJ; van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Oct; 26(7):781-96. PubMed ID: 19946749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of three dimensional quantitative coronary analysis by using rotational angiography for measurement of vessel length and diameter.
    Lee JB; Chang SG; Kim SY; Lee YS; Ryu JK; Choi JY; Kim KS; Park JS
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Oct; 28(7):1627-34. PubMed ID: 22179945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment.
    Jin ZG; Zhang ZQ; Jing LM; Wei YJ; Zhang J; Luo JP; Yang SL; Ma DX; Liu Y; Han W; Yang Y; Liu HL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 27730313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).
    Schuurbiers JC; Lopez NG; Ligthart J; Gijsen FJ; Dijkstra J; Serruys PW; Van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 19309696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Liu L; Yang W; Nagahara Y; Li Y; Lamooki SR; Muramatsu T; Kitslaar P; Sarai M; Ozaki Y; Barlis P; Yan F; Reiber JH; Tu S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 26507326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
    Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmental comparison between a dedicated bifurcation stent and balloon angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography: A subgroup analysis of the Tryton IDE randomized trial.
    Grundeken MJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kumsars I; Lesiak M; Kayaert P; Dens J; Stella PR; de Winter RJ; Laak LL; Généreux P; Kaplan AV; Leon MB; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):E53-E63. PubMed ID: 27083384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.