These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30441043)

  • 1. ROAST: An Open-Source, Fully-Automated, Realistic Volumetric-Approach-Based Simulator For TES.
    Huang Y; Datta A; Bikson M; Parra LC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():3072-3075. PubMed ID: 30441043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation-ROAST-a fully automated open-source pipeline.
    Huang Y; Datta A; Bikson M; Parra LC
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Jul; 16(5):056006. PubMed ID: 31071686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applications of open-source software ROAST in clinical studies: A review.
    Nasimova M; Huang Y
    Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(4):1002-1010. PubMed ID: 35843597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
    Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A flexible workflow for simulating transcranial electric stimulation in healthy and lesioned brains.
    Kalloch B; Bazin PL; Villringer A; Sehm B; Hlawitschka M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0228119. PubMed ID: 32407389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.
    Nielsen JD; Madsen KH; Puonti O; Siebner HR; Bauer C; Madsen CG; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():587-598. PubMed ID: 29518567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
    Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate and robust whole-head segmentation from magnetic resonance images for individualized head modeling.
    Puonti O; Van Leemput K; Saturnino GB; Siebner HR; Madsen KH; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():117044. PubMed ID: 32534963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head.
    Huang Y; Dmochowski JP; Su Y; Datta A; Rorden C; Parra LC
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Dec; 10(6):066004. PubMed ID: 24099977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.
    Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Sadleir RJ
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026019. PubMed ID: 30605892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. i-SATA: A MATLAB based toolbox to estimate current density generated by transcranial direct current stimulation in an individual brain.
    Kashyap R; Bhattacharjee S; Arumugam R; Oishi K; Desmond JE; Chen SA
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Oct; 17(5):056034. PubMed ID: 32674087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An automated method for high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation modeling.
    Huang Y; Su Y; Rorden C; Dmochowski J; Datta A; Parra LC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5376-9. PubMed ID: 23367144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-individual and age-dependent variability in simulated electric fields induced by conventional transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Antonenko D; Grittner U; Saturnino G; Nierhaus T; Thielscher A; Flöel A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117413. PubMed ID: 33011418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models.
    Windhoff M; Opitz A; Thielscher A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Apr; 34(4):923-35. PubMed ID: 22109746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semi-automated generation of individual computational models of the human head and torso from MR images.
    Kalloch B; Bode J; Kozlov M; Pampel A; Hlawitschka M; Sehm B; Villringer A; Möller HE; Bazin PL
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):2090-2105. PubMed ID: 30230021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced tES and tDCS computational models by meninges emulation.
    Jiang J; Truong DQ; Esmaeilpour Z; Huang Y; Badran BW; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Jan; 17(1):016027. PubMed ID: 31689695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fully automated whole-head segmentation with improved smoothness and continuity, with theory reviewed.
    Huang Y; Parra LC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125477. PubMed ID: 25992793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of optimal injection current pattern for multichannel transcranial electrical stimulation without individual MRI using multiple head models.
    Lee S; Park J; Lee C; Ahn J; Ryu J; Lee SH; Im CH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jan; 243():107878. PubMed ID: 37890288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative performance of the finite element method and the boundary element fast multipole method for problems mimicking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
    Htet AT; Saturnino GB; Burnham EH; Noetscher GM; Nummenmaa A; Makarov SN
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):024001. PubMed ID: 30605893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.