230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30441277)
41. Validating a Sham Condition for Use in High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Garnett EO; den Ouden DB
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):551-4. PubMed ID: 25686528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Pursuit of DLPFC: Non-neuronavigated Methods to Target the Left Dorsolateral Pre-frontal Cortex With Symmetric Bicephalic Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).
Seibt O; Brunoni AR; Huang Y; Bikson M
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):590-602. PubMed ID: 25862601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. High definition-transcranial direct current stimulation changes older adults' subjective sleep and corresponding resting-state functional connectivity.
Sheng J; Xie C; Fan DQ; Lei X; Yu J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():1-8. PubMed ID: 29750977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Individually optimized multi-channel tDCS for targeting somatosensory cortex.
Khan A; Antonakakis M; Vogenauer N; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Feb; 134():9-26. PubMed ID: 34923283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Significant group-level hotspots found in deep brain regions during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A computational analysis of electric fields.
Gomez-Tames J; Asai A; Hirata A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Mar; 131(3):755-765. PubMed ID: 31839398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Electrode Montages May Differentially Impact Variables of Walking Performance in Individuals Poststroke: A Preliminary Study.
Seamon BA; Bowden MG; Kindred JH; Embry AE; Kautz SA
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Jan; 40(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 34009847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Dry tDCS: Tolerability of a novel multilayer hydrogel composite non-adhesive electrode for transcranial direct current stimulation.
Khadka N; Borges H; Zannou AL; Jang J; Kim B; Lee K; Bikson M
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):1044-1053. PubMed ID: 30072144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Single Sessions of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Alter Lower Extremity Biomechanical or Corticomotor Response Variables Post-stroke.
Kindred JH; Kautz SA; Wonsetler EC; Bowden MG
Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():286. PubMed ID: 31031579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study.
Kuo HI; Bikson M; Datta A; Minhas P; Paulus W; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 23149292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS.
Saturnino GB; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():25-35. PubMed ID: 26142274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES).
Bortoletto M; Rodella C; Salvador R; Miranda PC; Miniussi C
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target.
Dmochowski JP; Datta A; Bikson M; Su Y; Parra LC
J Neural Eng; 2011 Aug; 8(4):046011. PubMed ID: 21659696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A novel technique for accurate electrode placement over cortical targets for transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) clinical trials.
Jog M; Anderson C; Kim E; Garrett A; Kubicki A; Gonzalez S; Jann K; Iacoboni M; Woods R; Wang DJ; Narr KL
J Neural Eng; 2021 Oct; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 34555822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Stimulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Enhances Adaptive Cognitive Control: A High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study.
Gbadeyan O; McMahon K; Steinhauser M; Meinzer M
J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(50):12530-12536. PubMed ID: 27974612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Testing assumptions on prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation: Comparison of electrode montages using multimodal fMRI.
Wörsching J; Padberg F; Goerigk S; Heinz I; Bauer C; Plewnia C; Hasan A; Ertl-Wagner B; Keeser D
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):998-1007. PubMed ID: 29759944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Key factors in the cortical response to transcranial electrical Stimulations-A multi-scale modeling study.
Chung H; Im C; Seo H; Jun SC
Comput Biol Med; 2022 May; 144():105328. PubMed ID: 35231800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Putting focus on transcranial direct current stimulation in language production studies.
Klaus J; Schutter DJLG
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202730. PubMed ID: 30138361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals.
Foerster Á; Dutta A; Kuo MF; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 47(7):779-789. PubMed ID: 29443433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
