126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30441694)
1. Mechanisms of Bone-conducted Ultrasonic Perception Assessed by Measurements of Acoustic Fields in the Outer Ear Canal and Vibrations of the Tympanic Membrane.
Nakagawa S; Ito K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5962-5965. PubMed ID: 30441694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new approach to the study of impedance characteristics of tympanic membrane.
Bogomolov AV; Dragan SP
Dokl Biochem Biophys; 2015; 464():269-71. PubMed ID: 26518544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outer ear canal sound pressure and bone vibration measurement in SSD and CHL patients using a transcutaneous bone conduction instrument.
Ghoncheh M; Lilli G; Lenarz T; Maier H
Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():161-168. PubMed ID: 26723102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors contributing to bone conduction: the outer ear.
Stenfelt S; Wild T; Hato N; Goode RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):902-13. PubMed ID: 12597184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An examination of the effects of broadband air-conduction masker on the speech intelligibility of speech-modulated bone-conduction ultrasound.
Nishimura T; Okayasu T; Saito O; Shimokura R; Yamashita A; Yamanaka T; Hosoi H; Kitahara T
Hear Res; 2014 Nov; 317():41-9. PubMed ID: 25285623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peripheral perception mechanism of ultrasonic hearing.
Nishimura T; Okayasu T; Uratani Y; Fukuda F; Saito O; Hosoi H
Hear Res; 2011 Jul; 277(1-2):176-83. PubMed ID: 21238563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Vibrations of the human tympanic membrane measured with Laser Doppler Vibrometer].
Szymański M; Rusinek R; Zadrozniak M; Warmiński J; Morshed K
Otolaryngol Pol; 2009; 63(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 19681493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal window of integration estimated by omission in bone-conducted ultrasound.
Okayasu T; Nishimura T; Uratani Y; Yamashita A; Nakagawa S; Yamanaka T; Hosoi H; Kitahara T
Neurosci Lett; 2019 Mar; 696():1-6. PubMed ID: 30476566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between bone-conducted ultrasound and audible sound in speech recognition.
Yamashita A; Nishimura T; Nagatani Y; Okayasu T; Koizumi T; Sakaguchi T; Hosoi H
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2009 Jun; (562):34-9. PubMed ID: 19848237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human ultrasonic hearing is induced by a direct ultrasonic stimulation of the cochlea.
Okayasu T; Nishimura T; Yamashita A; Saito O; Fukuda F; Yanai S; Hosoi H
Neurosci Lett; 2013 Feb; 539():71-6. PubMed ID: 23384569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessments of basic properties of distal-presented bone-conducted ultrasonic hearing.
Ogino R; Otsuka S; Nakagawa S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():2198-2201. PubMed ID: 30440841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inner Ear Excitation in Normal and Postmastoidectomy Participants by Fluid Stimulation in the Absence of Air- and Bone-Conduction Mechanisms.
Ronen O; Geal-Dor M; Kaufmann-Yehezkely M; Perez R; Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):152-160. PubMed ID: 28240982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element modelling of sound transmission from outer to inner ear.
Areias B; Santos C; Natal Jorge RM; Gentil F; Parente MP
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Nov; 230(11):999-1007. PubMed ID: 27591576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
Small SA; Hu N
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response of the human tympanic membrane to transient acoustic and mechanical stimuli: Preliminary results.
Razavi P; Ravicz ME; Dobrev I; Cheng JT; Furlong C; Rosowski JJ
Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():15-24. PubMed ID: 26880098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Establishment of a cochlear injury model using bone-conducted ultrasound irradiation in guinea pigs and investigation on peripheral coding and recognition of ultrasonic signals.
Wang F; Cao C; Huang C; Li Q; Li T; Liu X; Zhang S; Ceng X; Wang C
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2018 Sep; 64(12):2-10. PubMed ID: 30301494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of ability to discriminate frequency of bone-conducted ultrasound by mismatch fields.
Yamashita A; Nishimura T; Nakagawa S; Sakaguchi T; Hosoi H
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 18455304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ABC's of impedance audiometry.
Sheehy JL; Hughes RL
Laryngoscope; 1974 Nov; 84(11):1935-49. PubMed ID: 4437243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone-conduction hearing and the occlusion effect in otosclerosis and normal controls.
Tsai V; Ostroff J; Korman M; Chen JM
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Nov; 26(6):1138-42. PubMed ID: 16272931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Duration-dependent growth of N1m for speech-modulated bone-conducted ultrasound.
Okayasu T; Nishimura T; Yamashita A; Nakagawa S; Nagatani Y; Yanai S; Uratani Y; Hosoi H
Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 21439350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
