These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30442221)

  • 1. WHICH DATABASES SHOULD BE USED TO IDENTIFY STUDIES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS?
    Arber M; Glanville J; Isojarvi J; Baragula E; Edwards M; Shaw A; Wood H
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(6):547-554. PubMed ID: 30442221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: HOW EXTENSIVE ARE THEIR SEARCHES?
    Wood H; Arber M; Glanville JM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28343452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How well do search filters perform in identifying economic evaluations in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Glanville J; Kaunelis D; Mensinkai S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 19845982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):200. PubMed ID: 30458825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
    Hanneke R; Young SK
    Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Database selection and data gathering methods in systematic reviews of qualitative research regarding diabetes mellitus - an explorative study.
    Justesen T; Freyberg J; Schultz ANØ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 33941105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study.
    Goossen K; Hess S; Lunny C; Pieper D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):138. PubMed ID: 32487023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
    Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Searching literature databases for health care economic evaluations: how systematic can we afford to be?
    Sassi F; Archard L; McDaid D
    Med Care; 2002 May; 40(5):387-94. PubMed ID: 11961473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen.
    Prady SL; Uphoff EP; Power M; Golder S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):106. PubMed ID: 30314471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking.
    Preston L; Carroll C; Gardois P; Paisley S; Kaltenthaler E
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():82. PubMed ID: 26113080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery.
    Goossen K; Tenckhoff S; Probst P; Grummich K; Mihaljevic AL; Büchler MW; Diener MK
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Feb; 403(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 29209758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond Medline: reducing bias through extended systematic review search.
    Savoie I; Helmer D; Green CJ; Kazanjian A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(1):168-78. PubMed ID: 12701949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.
    Topfer LA; Parada A; Menon D; Noorani H; Perras C; Serra-Prat M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 10507189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Searching for qualitative health research required several databases and alternative search strategies: a study of coverage in bibliographic databases.
    Frandsen TF; Gildberg FA; Tingleff EB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():118-124. PubMed ID: 31251982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Mast F; Kleijnen J
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):510-520. PubMed ID: 29073718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
    Royle P; Waugh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.