These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30442377)
1. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery. Gjelvold B; Mahmood DJH; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used. Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 36690552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides. D'haese R; Vrombaut T; Hommez G; De Bruyn H; Vandeweghe S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 35727238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques. Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study. Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study. Yeung M; Abdulmajeed A; Carrico CK; Deeb GR; Bencharit S J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of DLP and SLA printer technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for implant dentistry in free-end situations. Le V; Keßler A; Folwaczny M Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 36625374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of guided implant surgery obtained using 3D-printed surgical guides - An in vitro comparison of four evaluation methods. Herstell H; Berndt S; Kühne C; Reich S Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 35851354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Manufacturing Technique on the Accuracy of Surgical Guides for Static Computer-Aided Implant Surgery. Abduo J; Lau D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(5):931-938. PubMed ID: 32991643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study. Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation. Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers? Deeb GR; Allen RK; Hall VP; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Bencharit S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. PubMed ID: 28863884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of a chairside, fused deposition modeling three-dimensional-printed, single tooth surgical guide for implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Sun Y; Ding Q; Yuan F; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Oct; 33(10):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35852859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides. Keßler A; Dosch M; Reymus M; Folwaczny M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 33573833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed. Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of surgical guides manufactured with four different 3D printers. A comparative in vitro study. Morón-Conejo B; Berrendero S; Salido MP; Zarauz C; Pradíes G J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105226. PubMed ID: 38971459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of metal sleeve-free 3D-printed implant surgical guides. Oh KC; Park JM; Shim JS; Kim JH; Kim JE; Kim JH Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):468-476. PubMed ID: 30685109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative assessment of the positional accuracy of dental implants inserted using computerised stackable surgical guides made using selective laser melting and digital light processing technologies for patients with maxillary terminal dentition. Hameed HA; Hebeshi A Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2023 May; 16(2):135-144. PubMed ID: 37158182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]