494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30442537)
1. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bajaj A; Pancholy S; Sothwal A; Nawaz Y; Boruah P
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.
Rashid M; Rushton CA; Kwok CS; Kinnaird T; Kontopantelis E; Olier I; Ludman P; De Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 29169494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahsan MJ; Ahmad S; Latif A; Lateef N; Ahsan MZ; Abusnina W; Nathan S; Altin SE; Kolte DS; Messenger JC; Tannenbaum M; Goldsweig AM
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2022 Sep; 8(6):640-650. PubMed ID: 35460230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery via transradial approach feasible for skilled transfemoral operators? Initial experience in an unselected population.
Tomassini F; Gagnor A; Montali N; Gambino A; Bollati M; Infantino V; Tizzani E; Varbella F
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 23768506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between radial and femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials.
Ye Y; Zeng Y
Coron Artery Dis; 2019 Mar; 30(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30531449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transition Towards Transradial Approach Improves Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction PCI.
Kalpak O; Donev D; Pejkov H; Antov S; Kalpak G; Kedev S
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Sep; 38(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 28991770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention of left main disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Ando T; Aoi S; Ashraf S; Villablanca PA; Telila T; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Afonso L; Grines CL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 94(2):264-273. PubMed ID: 30536799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chugh Y; Bavishi C; Mojadidi MK; Elgendy IY; Faillace RT; Brilakis ES; Tamis-Holland J; Mamas M; Chugh SK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 32521099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.
Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arterial access site and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without vorapaxar.
Déry JP; Mahaffey KW; Tricoci P; White HD; Podder M; Westerhout CM; Moliterno DJ; Harrington RA; Chen E; Strony J; Van de Werf F; Ziada KM; Held C; Aylward PE; Armstrong PW; Rao SV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 88(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 26698636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Sex on Comparative Outcomes of Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Data From the Randomized MATRIX-Access Trial.
Gargiulo G; Ariotti S; Vranckx P; Leonardi S; Frigoli E; Ciociano N; Tumscitz C; Tomassini F; Calabrò P; Garducci S; Crimi G; Andò G; Ferrario M; Limbruno U; Cortese B; Sganzerla P; Lupi A; Russo F; Garbo R; Ausiello A; Zavalloni D; Sardella G; Esposito G; Santarelli A; Tresoldi S; Nazzaro MS; Zingarelli A; Petronio AS; Windecker S; da Costa BR; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 29301646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Transradial PCI compared to Transfemoral PCI in veterans with anemia: Insight from the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) program.
Bagai J; Hess E; Penny WF; Plomondon ME; Waldo SW
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Nov; 20(11):990-996. PubMed ID: 30679117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radial versus femoral access for left main percutaneous coronary intervention: An analysis from the Veterans Affairs Clinical, Reporting, and Tracking Program.
Bhardwaj B; Gunzburger E; Valle JA; Grunwald GK; Plomondon ME; Vidovich MI; Aggarwal K; Karuparthi PR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(2):480-488. PubMed ID: 34847279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy radial access is safer and as efficient as femoral access.
Kübler P; Zimoch W; Kosowski M; Tomasiewicz B; Telichowski A; Reczuch K
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 31(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 29468734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
