484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30442734)
1. Evaluation of New Tests and Interventions for Prostate Cancer Management: A Systematic Review.
Olleik G; Kassouf W; Aprikian A; Hu J; Vanhuyse M; Cury F; Peacock S; Bonnevier E; Palenius E; Dragomir A
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1340-1351. PubMed ID: 30442734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PROGENSA® prostate cancer antigen 3 assay and the Prostate Health Index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Nicholson A; Mahon J; Boland A; Beale S; Dwan K; Fleeman N; Hockenhull J; Dundar Y
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Oct; 19(87):i-xxxi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 26507078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions.
Hendriks RJ; van Oort IM; Schalken JA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Mar; 20(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27922627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Identification, Management, and Outcomes.
Moschini M; Carroll PR; Eggener SE; Epstein JI; Graefen M; Montironi R; Parker C
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):238-249. PubMed ID: 28318726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contemporary role of prostate cancer antigen 3 in the management of prostate cancer.
Auprich M; Bjartell A; Chun FK; de la Taille A; Freedland SJ; Haese A; Schalken J; Stenzl A; Tombal B; van der Poel H
Eur Urol; 2011 Nov; 60(5):1045-54. PubMed ID: 21871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Nieboer D; Giganti F; Moore CM; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):946-958. PubMed ID: 29679430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic Markers in Prostate Cancer Decision Making.
Cucchiara V; Cooperberg MR; Dall'Era M; Lin DW; Montorsi F; Schalken JA; Evans CP
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):572-582. PubMed ID: 29129398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic Biomarkers Used for Localised Prostate Cancer Management: A Systematic Review.
Lamy PJ; Allory Y; Gauchez AS; Asselain B; Beuzeboc P; de Cremoux P; Fontugne J; Georges A; Hennequin C; Lehmann-Che J; Massard C; Millet I; Murez T; Schlageter MH; Rouvière O; Kassab-Chahmi D; Rozet F; Descotes JL; Rébillard X
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Dec; 4(6):790-803. PubMed ID: 28753865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy.
Willemse PM; Davis NF; Grivas N; Zattoni F; Lardas M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; De Santis M; Dell'Oglio P; Donaldson JF; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Gillessen S; Grummet JP; Henry AM; Liew M; MacLennan S; Mason MD; Moris L; Plass K; O'Hanlon S; Omar MI; Oprea-Lager DE; Pang KH; Paterson CC; Ploussard G; Rouvière O; Schoots IG; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; Van den Broeck T; van der Kwast TH; van der Poel HG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TBL
Eur Urol; 2022 Apr; 81(4):337-346. PubMed ID: 34980492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumour markers in prostate cancer: The post-prostate-specific antigen era.
Garrido MM; Bernardino RM; Marta JC; Holdenrieder S; Guimarães JT
Ann Clin Biochem; 2022 Jan; 59(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 34463154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate health index (phi) and prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) significantly improve diagnostic accuracy in patients undergoing prostate biopsy.
Perdonà S; Bruzzese D; Ferro M; Autorino R; Marino A; Mazzarella C; Perruolo G; Longo M; Spinelli R; Di Lorenzo G; Oliva A; De Sio M; Damiano R; Altieri V; Terracciano D
Prostate; 2013 Feb; 73(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 22821756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing unnecessary biopsies while detecting clinically significant prostate cancer including cribriform growth with the ERSPC Rotterdam risk calculator and 4Kscore.
Verbeek JFM; Bangma CH; Kweldam CF; van der Kwast TH; Kümmerlin IP; van Leenders GJLH; Roobol MJ
Urol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 30528698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomarkers for prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and beyond.
Duffy MJ
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Feb; 58(3):326-339. PubMed ID: 31714881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Plus PCA3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment.
Tomlins SA; Day JR; Lonigro RJ; Hovelson DH; Siddiqui J; Kunju LP; Dunn RL; Meyer S; Hodge P; Groskopf J; Wei JT; Chinnaiyan AM
Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 25985884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel tools to improve patient selection and monitoring on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.
van den Bergh RC; Ahmed HU; Bangma CH; Cooperberg MR; Villers A; Parker CC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1023-31. PubMed ID: 24491309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.
Mottet N; Bellmunt J; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; De Santis M; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; Lam TB; Mason MD; Matveev VB; Moldovan PC; van den Bergh RCN; Van den Broeck T; van der Poel HG; van der Kwast TH; Rouvière O; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Cornford P
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):618-629. PubMed ID: 27568654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of prostate cancer biomarkers in undiagnosed men.
Dani H; Loeb S
Curr Opin Urol; 2017 May; 27(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28212119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
