These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30443865)

  • 21. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
    Dagassan-Berndt DC; Zitzmann NU; Walter C; Schulze RK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography-a comparative study.
    Malina-Altzinger J; Damerau G; Grätz KW; Stadlinger PD
    Int J Implant Dent; 2015 Dec; 1(1):17. PubMed ID: 27747639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional radiography versus cone beam computed tomography.
    Katheria BC; Kau CH; Tate R; Chen JW; English J; Bouquot J
    Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 20836949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.
    Abdelkarim A
    Dent J (Basel); 2019 Sep; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 31480667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Panoramic radiography is of limited value in the evaluation of maxillary sinus disease.
    Constantine S; Clark B; Kiermeier A; Anderson PP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Mar; 127(3):237-246. PubMed ID: 30477956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CBCT in Advanced Dental Education: A Survey of U.S. Postdoctoral Periodontics Programs.
    Beals DW; Parashar V; Francis JR; Agostini GM; Gill A
    J Dent Educ; 2020 Mar; 84(3):301-307. PubMed ID: 32176341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of orthopantomograms in the assessment of implant position following alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement.
    Mian M; Fink S; Ackland D; Wang N; Dimitroulis G
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 24(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 32306164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
    Hodges RJ; Atchison KA; White SC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 23631968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Diagnostic value of dental implants in the posterior maxilla using cone beam computed tomography].
    Fan LF; Pan XG; Pu YP; Lai HC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 18989602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Clinical Decision Making among Specialists.
    Rodríguez G; Abella F; Durán-Sindreu F; Patel S; Roig M
    J Endod; 2017 Feb; 43(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 28132707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital Orthopantomography vs Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Part 1: Detection of Periapical Lesions.
    Maddalone M; Bonfanti E; Pellegatta A; Citterio CL; Baldoni M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 May; 20(5):593-597. PubMed ID: 31316024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy and reliability of tooth length measurements on conventional and CBCT images: An
    Adarsh K; Sharma P; Juneja A
    J Orthod Sci; 2018; 7():17. PubMed ID: 30271762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: A Review.
    Tadinada A; Marczak A; Yadav S; Mukherjee PM
    Turk J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 29(3):73-79. PubMed ID: 30112478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of Three-dimensional Imaging on Implant Treatment Planning: Implant Diameter and Length.
    Dagassan-Berndt DC; Clemens W; Zitzmann NU; Schulze RK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):704-711. PubMed ID: 29959300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence supporting the use of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Kuijpers MA; Bergé SJ; Schols JG; Maal TJ; Breuning H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Mar; 143(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 22383204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of symptomatic maxillary sinus pathologies using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of professional training.
    Dau M; Marciak P; Al-Nawas B; Staedt H; Alshiri A; Frerich B; Kämmerer PW
    Int J Implant Dent; 2017 Dec; 3(1):13. PubMed ID: 28382560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
    Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Agreement among orthodontists experienced with cone-beam computed tomography on the need for follow-up and the clinical impact of craniofacial findings from multiplanar and 3-dimensional reconstructed views.
    Edwards R; Alsufyani N; Heo G; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):264-73. PubMed ID: 26232835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use.
    Kapila SD; Nervina JM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140282. PubMed ID: 25358833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.