These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30444184)

  • 41. Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: the case of Dutch plural nouns.
    Kemps RJ; Ernestus M; Schreuder R; Baayen RH
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):430-46. PubMed ID: 16156179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Syntactic structure guides prosody in temporarily ambiguous sentences.
    Anderson C; Carlson K
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 4):472-93. PubMed ID: 21313990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The ontogeny of early language discrimination: Beyond rhythm.
    Zacharaki K; Sebastian-Galles N
    Cognition; 2021 Aug; 213():104628. PubMed ID: 33618839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment.
    Morrill T; Baese-Berk M; Heffner C; Dilley L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1451-7. PubMed ID: 25794478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A landmark-cue-based approach to analyzing the acoustic realizations of American English intervocalic flaps.
    Yun S; Choi JY; Shattuck-Hufnagel S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):EL471. PubMed ID: 32611168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Acoustic cues to grammatical structure in infant-directed speech: cross-linguistic evidence.
    Fisher C; Tokura H
    Child Dev; 1996 Dec; 67(6):3192-218. PubMed ID: 9071777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is infant-directed speech interesting because it is surprising? - Linking properties of IDS to statistical learning and attention at the prosodic level.
    Räsänen O; Kakouros S; Soderstrom M
    Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():193-206. PubMed ID: 29885600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues.
    Llanos F; Dmitrieva O; Shultz A; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2213-24. PubMed ID: 23967951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second-language users of English.
    Ylinen S; Uther M; Latvala A; Vepsäläinen S; Iverson P; Akahane-Yamada R; Näätänen R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1319-32. PubMed ID: 19445609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Perception of English intonation by English, Spanish, and Chinese listeners.
    Grabe E; Rosner BS; García-Albea JE; Zhou X
    Lang Speech; 2003; 46(Pt 4):375-401. PubMed ID: 15198113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Durations of American English vowels by native and non-native speakers: acoustic analyses and perceptual effects.
    Liu C; Jin SH; Chen CT
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):238-53. PubMed ID: 25102608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
    Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Adaptation to time-compressed speech: phonological determinants.
    Sebastián-Gallés N; Dupoux E; Costa A; Mehler J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 May; 62(4):834-42. PubMed ID: 10883588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Lexical Segmentation in Artificial Word Learning: The Effects of Converging Sublexical Cues.
    Bagou O; Frauenfelder UH
    Lang Speech; 2018 Mar; 61(1):3-30. PubMed ID: 29280405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Fundamental frequency as a perceptual cue for vowel identification in speakers with Parkinson's disease.
    Bunton K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(5):323-39. PubMed ID: 16966834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cortical encoding and neurophysiological tracking of intensity and pitch cues signaling English stress patterns in native and nonnative speakers.
    Chung WL; Bidelman GM
    Brain Lang; 2016; 155-156():49-57. PubMed ID: 27140864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Optical phonetics and visual perception of lexical and phrasal stress in English.
    Scarborough R; Keating P; Mattys SL; Cho T; Alwan A
    Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):135-75. PubMed ID: 19624028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Acoustic characteristics of Korean-English bilingual speakers' /l/ and the relationship to their foreign accent ratings.
    Chung H; Kim Y
    J Commun Disord; 2021; 94():106157. PubMed ID: 34653724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Tale of Two Features: Perception of Cantonese Lexical Tone and English Lexical Stress in Cantonese-English Bilinguals.
    Tong X; Lee SM; Lee MM; Burnham D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142896. PubMed ID: 26606073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of Sound Change on the Weighting of Acoustic Cues to the Three-Way Laryngeal Stop Contrast in Korean: Diachronic and Dialectal Comparisons.
    Lee H; Jongman A
    Lang Speech; 2019 Sep; 62(3):509-530. PubMed ID: 30014745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.