These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30444356)

  • 21. Effect of Functional Chemistry on the Rejection of Low-Molecular Weight Neutral Organics through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Oct; 53(19):11401-11409. PubMed ID: 31513383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of reverse osmosis membrane age on rejection of NDMA precursors and formation of NDMA in finished water after full advanced treatment for potable reuse.
    Roback SL; Ishida KP; Plumlee MH
    Chemosphere; 2019 Oct; 233():120-131. PubMed ID: 31170582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Group Contribution Method to Predict the Mass Transfer Coefficients of Organics through Various RO Membranes.
    Kibler R; Mohrhardt B; Zhang M; Breitner L; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(8):5167-5177. PubMed ID: 32208649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Nanofiltration Decision Tool for Potable Reuse: A New Rejection Model for Recalcitrant CECs.
    Jones SM; Watts MJ; Wickramasinghe SR
    Water Environ Res; 2017 Nov; 89(11):1942-1951. PubMed ID: 28577313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Boron Can Be Used to Predict Trace Organic Rejection through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(23):13871-13878. PubMed ID: 30444356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rejection of trace organic compounds by forward osmosis membranes: a literature review.
    Coday BD; Yaffe BG; Xu P; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(7):3612-24. PubMed ID: 24552278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficiently Combining Water Reuse and Desalination through Forward Osmosis-Reverse Osmosis (FO-RO) Hybrids: A Critical Review.
    Blandin G; Verliefde AR; Comas J; Rodriguez-Roda I; Le-Clech P
    Membranes (Basel); 2016 Jul; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 27376337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling micropollutant removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: considerations and challenges.
    Castaño Osorio S; Biesheuvel PM; Spruijt E; Dykstra JE; van der Wal A
    Water Res; 2022 Oct; 225():119130. PubMed ID: 36240724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Review on the fate of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment and water reuse with membranes.
    Siegrist H; Joss A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 22828319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contaminants of emerging concern in reverse osmosis brine concentrate from indirect/direct water reuse applications.
    Romeyn TR; Harijanto W; Sandoval S; Delagah S; Sharbatmaleki M
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(2):236-50. PubMed ID: 26819378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reverse osmosis integrity monitoring in water reuse: The challenge to verify virus removal - A review.
    Pype ML; Lawrence MG; Keller J; Gernjak W
    Water Res; 2016 Jul; 98():384-95. PubMed ID: 27128885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Potential and limitation of fluorescence-based membrane integrity monitoring (FMIM) for reverse osmosis membranes.
    Yoon SH
    Water Res; 2019 May; 154():287-297. PubMed ID: 30802703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Extending the life-cycle of reverse osmosis membranes: A review.
    Coutinho de Paula E; Amaral MCS
    Waste Manag Res; 2017 May; 35(5):456-470. PubMed ID: 28097920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Novel technologies for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment: a review.
    Joo SH; Tansel B
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 150():322-335. PubMed ID: 25528173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nanocomposite Polymeric Membranes for Organic Micropollutant Removal: A Critical Review.
    Wu Y; Chen M; Lee HJ; A Ganzoury M; Zhang N; de Lannoy CF
    ACS ES T Eng; 2022 Sep; 2(9):1574-1598. PubMed ID: 36120114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.