These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30444653)

  • 1. Purring Crickets: The Evolution of a Novel Sexual Signal.
    Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gurule-Small GA; Hallagan CJ; Wilson JD
    Am Nat; 2018 Dec; 192(6):773-782. PubMed ID: 30444653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel cricket morph has diverged in song and wing morphology across island populations.
    Gallagher JH; Zonana DM; Broder ED; Syammach AM; Tinghitella RM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Nov; 36(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 37885146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual signal loss: The link between behaviour and rapid evolutionary dynamics in a field cricket.
    Zuk M; Bailey NW; Gray B; Rotenberry JT
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):623-633. PubMed ID: 29417997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral responses of a parasitoid fly to rapidly evolving host signals.
    Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Venable CP; Zonana DM; Ingley SJ; Smith TC; Tinghitella RM
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9193. PubMed ID: 35979522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct and indirect effects of sexual signal loss on female reproduction in the Pacific field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus).
    Heinen-Kay JL; Strub DB; Balenger SL; Zuk M
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Dec; 32(12):1382-1390. PubMed ID: 31495021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets.
    Zuk M; Rotenberry JT; Tinghitella RM
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):521-4. PubMed ID: 17148278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obligately silent males sire more offspring than singers in a rapidly evolving cricket population.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Urquhart EM; Zuk M
    Biol Lett; 2019 Jul; 15(7):20190198. PubMed ID: 31362608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual signal loss, pleiotropy, and maintenance of a male reproductive polymorphism in crickets.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Nichols RE; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2020 May; 74(5):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 32187385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication.
    Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Zonana DM
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):797. PubMed ID: 33542210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid sexual signal diversification is facilitated by permissive females.
    Zhang R; Rayner JG; Bailey NW
    Curr Biol; 2024 Jan; 34(2):403-409.e3. PubMed ID: 38141618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal.
    Tinghitella RM; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2087-98. PubMed ID: 19473387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual signal loss in field crickets maintained despite strong sexual selection favoring singing males.
    Tanner JC; Swanger E; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2019 Jul; 73(7):1482-1489. PubMed ID: 31243769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vestigial singing behaviour persists after the evolutionary loss of song in crickets.
    Schneider WT; Rutz C; Hedwig B; Bailey NW
    Biol Lett; 2018 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 29445043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can behaviour impede evolution? Persistence of singing effort after morphological song loss in crickets.
    Rayner JG; Schneider WT; Bailey NW
    Biol Lett; 2020 Jun; 16(6):20190931. PubMed ID: 32544378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency as a releaser in the courtship song of two crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer) and Teleogryllus oceanicus: a neuroethological analysis.
    Libersat F; Murray JA; Hoy RR
    J Comp Physiol A; 1994 Apr; 174(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 8182564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Replicated evolutionary divergence in the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of male crickets associated with the loss of song in the Hawaiian archipelago.
    Simmons LW; Thomas ML; Gray B; Zuk M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2249-57. PubMed ID: 25228329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid evolutionary change in a sexual signal: genetic control of the mutation 'flatwing' that renders male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) mute.
    Tinghitella RM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Mar; 100(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18000520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the role of trait reversal in evolutionary diversification using song loss in wild crickets.
    Bailey NW; Pascoal S; Montealegre-Z F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(18):8941-8949. PubMed ID: 30992379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus.
    Simmons LW; Zuk M; Rotenberry JT
    Evolution; 2001 Jul; 55(7):1386-94. PubMed ID: 11525462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A silent orchestra: convergent song loss in Hawaiian crickets is repeated, morphologically varied, and widespread.
    Rayner JG; Aldridge S; Montealegre-Z F; Bailey NW
    Ecology; 2019 Aug; 100(8):e02694. PubMed ID: 30945280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.