187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30444653)
1. Purring Crickets: The Evolution of a Novel Sexual Signal.
Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gurule-Small GA; Hallagan CJ; Wilson JD
Am Nat; 2018 Dec; 192(6):773-782. PubMed ID: 30444653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel cricket morph has diverged in song and wing morphology across island populations.
Gallagher JH; Zonana DM; Broder ED; Syammach AM; Tinghitella RM
J Evol Biol; 2023 Nov; 36(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 37885146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual signal loss: The link between behaviour and rapid evolutionary dynamics in a field cricket.
Zuk M; Bailey NW; Gray B; Rotenberry JT
J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):623-633. PubMed ID: 29417997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Behavioral responses of a parasitoid fly to rapidly evolving host signals.
Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Venable CP; Zonana DM; Ingley SJ; Smith TC; Tinghitella RM
Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9193. PubMed ID: 35979522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct and indirect effects of sexual signal loss on female reproduction in the Pacific field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus).
Heinen-Kay JL; Strub DB; Balenger SL; Zuk M
J Evol Biol; 2019 Dec; 32(12):1382-1390. PubMed ID: 31495021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets.
Zuk M; Rotenberry JT; Tinghitella RM
Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):521-4. PubMed ID: 17148278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obligately silent males sire more offspring than singers in a rapidly evolving cricket population.
Heinen-Kay JL; Urquhart EM; Zuk M
Biol Lett; 2019 Jul; 15(7):20190198. PubMed ID: 31362608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual signal loss, pleiotropy, and maintenance of a male reproductive polymorphism in crickets.
Heinen-Kay JL; Nichols RE; Zuk M
Evolution; 2020 May; 74(5):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 32187385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication.
Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Zonana DM
Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):797. PubMed ID: 33542210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid sexual signal diversification is facilitated by permissive females.
Zhang R; Rayner JG; Bailey NW
Curr Biol; 2024 Jan; 34(2):403-409.e3. PubMed ID: 38141618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal.
Tinghitella RM; Zuk M
Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2087-98. PubMed ID: 19473387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual signal loss in field crickets maintained despite strong sexual selection favoring singing males.
Tanner JC; Swanger E; Zuk M
Evolution; 2019 Jul; 73(7):1482-1489. PubMed ID: 31243769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vestigial singing behaviour persists after the evolutionary loss of song in crickets.
Schneider WT; Rutz C; Hedwig B; Bailey NW
Biol Lett; 2018 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 29445043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can behaviour impede evolution? Persistence of singing effort after morphological song loss in crickets.
Rayner JG; Schneider WT; Bailey NW
Biol Lett; 2020 Jun; 16(6):20190931. PubMed ID: 32544378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency as a releaser in the courtship song of two crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer) and Teleogryllus oceanicus: a neuroethological analysis.
Libersat F; Murray JA; Hoy RR
J Comp Physiol A; 1994 Apr; 174(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 8182564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Replicated evolutionary divergence in the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of male crickets associated with the loss of song in the Hawaiian archipelago.
Simmons LW; Thomas ML; Gray B; Zuk M
J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2249-57. PubMed ID: 25228329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid evolutionary change in a sexual signal: genetic control of the mutation 'flatwing' that renders male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) mute.
Tinghitella RM
Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Mar; 100(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18000520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the role of trait reversal in evolutionary diversification using song loss in wild crickets.
Bailey NW; Pascoal S; Montealegre-Z F
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(18):8941-8949. PubMed ID: 30992379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus.
Simmons LW; Zuk M; Rotenberry JT
Evolution; 2001 Jul; 55(7):1386-94. PubMed ID: 11525462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A silent orchestra: convergent song loss in Hawaiian crickets is repeated, morphologically varied, and widespread.
Rayner JG; Aldridge S; Montealegre-Z F; Bailey NW
Ecology; 2019 Aug; 100(8):e02694. PubMed ID: 30945280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
