307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30444843)
1. Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
Mattingly JK; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e956-e963. PubMed ID: 30444843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Vasil K; Wucinich T; Pisoni DB; Baxter J; Ray C; Shafiro V
Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 28776711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.
Smith GNL; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1149-1161. PubMed ID: 30601227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
Capretta NR; Moberly AC
Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
Tamati TN; Ray C; Vasil KJ; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neurocognitive Factors Contributing to Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Moberly AC; Castellanos I; Mattingly JK
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e1010-e1018. PubMed ID: 30444846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive Functions in Adults Receiving Cochlear Implants: Predictors of Speech Recognition and Changes After Implantation.
Zhan KY; Lewis JH; Vasil KJ; Tamati TN; Harris MS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Ray C; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):e322-e329. PubMed ID: 31868779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Audiovisual Processing Skills Before Cochlear Implantation Predict Postoperative Speech Recognition in Adults.
Moberly AC; Pisoni DB; Tamati TN
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):617-625. PubMed ID: 38143302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Moberly AC; Reed J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 62(8):2895-2905. PubMed ID: 31330118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Relationship Between Environmental Sound Awareness and Speech Recognition Skills in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.
Harris MS; Boyce L; Pisoni DB; Shafiro V; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e308-e314. PubMed ID: 28731964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".
Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech?
Moberly AC; Vasil KJ; Wucinich TL; Safdar N; Boyce L; Roup C; Holt RF; Adunka OF; Castellanos I; Shafiro V; Houston DM; Pisoni DB
Laryngoscope; 2018 Nov; 128 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):. PubMed ID: 30325518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Word and Nonword Reading Efficiency in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Tamati TN; Vasil KJ; Kronenberger WG; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC; Ray C
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Mar; 42(3):e272-e278. PubMed ID: 33306660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term speech perception and morphosyntactic outcomes in adolescents and young adults implanted in childhood.
Mancini P; Nicastri M; Giallini I; Odabaşi Y; Greco A; Dincer D'Alessandro H; Portanova G; Mariani L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Apr; 167():111514. PubMed ID: 36947998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
Richter ME; Chatterjee M
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
