These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30444843)

  • 61. More Than Words: the Relative Roles of Prosody and Semantics in the Perception of Emotions in Spoken Language by Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Icht M; Ben-David BM
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1378-1389. PubMed ID: 35030551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.
    Farris-Trimble A; McMurray B; Cigrand N; Tomblin JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):308-27. PubMed ID: 24041330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. SAS-CIS preference study in postlingually deafened adults implanted with the CLARION cochlear implant.
    Osberger MJ; Fisher L
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():74-9. PubMed ID: 10214806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: The Degradation of Phonemic Sensitivity.
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jun; 37(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 26967255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Cochlear Implants in Adults: Effects of Age and Duration of Deafness on Speech Recognition.
    Beyea JA; McMullen KP; Harris MS; Houston DM; Martin JM; Bolster VA; Adunka OF; Moberly AC
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1238-45. PubMed ID: 27466894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.
    Meyer TA; Frisch SA; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RT; Svirsky MA
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jul; 24(4):612-20. PubMed ID: 12851554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Mandarin consonant contrast recognition among children with cochlear implants or hearing aids and normal-hearing children.
    Liu Q; Zhou N; Berger R; Huang D; Xu L
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):471-6. PubMed ID: 23486352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lawler M; Yu J; Aronoff JM
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Communication Under Sharply Degraded Auditory Input and the "2-Sentence" Problem.
    Svirsky MA; Neukam JD; Capach NH; Amichetti NM; Lavender A; Wingfield A
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1045-1058. PubMed ID: 38523125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Performance Plateau in Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Cusumano C; Friedmann DR; Fang Y; Wang B; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):334-338. PubMed ID: 28166183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Beyond Sentence Recognition in Quiet for Older Adults: Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Zhang E; Coelho DH
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):979-986. PubMed ID: 29912832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.
    Zaltz Y; Goldsworthy RL; Kishon-Rabin L; Eisenberg LS
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 19(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 29313147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):683-690. PubMed ID: 33493399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
    Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The Effects of Paired versus Sequential Stimulation on Speech Recognition Outcomes of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Holcomb MA; Dornhoffer JR; McRackan TR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 33461201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The effects of stimulus modality, task complexity, and cuing on working memory and the relationship with speech recognition in older cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Azuma T; Kolberg C; Pulling KR
    J Commun Disord; 2022; 95():106170. PubMed ID: 34839068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The Important Role of Contextual Information in Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Its Consequences in Speech Tests.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519838672. PubMed ID: 30991904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    O'Neill ER; Parke MN; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1224. PubMed ID: 33639827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.