741 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30445016)
1. Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review.
van der Pol CB; Lim CS; Sirlin CB; McGrath TA; Salameh JP; Bashir MR; Tang A; Singal AG; Costa AF; Fowler K; McInnes MDF
Gastroenterology; 2019 Mar; 156(4):976-986. PubMed ID: 30445016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lee S; Kim SS; Roh YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ
Liver Int; 2020 Jun; 40(6):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 32145134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT and MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
Lee S; Kim YY; Shin J; Hwang SH; Roh YH; Chung YE; Choi JY
J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1199-1206. PubMed ID: 32640250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percentages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LI-RADS Categories with CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lee S; Kim YY; Shin J; Son WJ; Roh YH; Choi JY; Sirlin CB; Chernyak V
Radiology; 2023 Apr; 307(1):e220646. PubMed ID: 36625748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of prospective application of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI.
Kim YY; An C; Kim S; Kim MJ
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):2038-2046. PubMed ID: 29230525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Shin J; Lee S; Bae H; Chung YE; Choi JY; Huh YM; Park MS
Liver Int; 2020 Oct; 40(10):2345-2352. PubMed ID: 32722894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: ESCULAP versus CEUS-LI-RADS.
Schellhaas B; Görtz RS; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Neurath MF; Strobel D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1036-1044. PubMed ID: 28562394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI-diagnosis of category LR-M observations in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shin J; Lee S; Hwang JA; Lee JE; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3319-3326. PubMed ID: 35031839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for MRI and CT detection of HCC: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
Liang Y; Xu F; Guo Y; Lai L; Jiang X; Wei X; Wu H; Wang J
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 134():109404. PubMed ID: 33276248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.
Ren AH; Zhao PF; Yang DW; Du JB; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):746-755. PubMed ID: 30648327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 in predicting malignant liver lesions in pediatric patients: a preliminary study.
Ludwig DR; Romberg EK; Fraum TJ; Rohe E; Fowler KJ; Khanna G
Pediatr Radiol; 2019 May; 49(6):746-758. PubMed ID: 31069473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Evaluation of Pediatric Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Khanna G; Chavhan GB; Schooler GR; Fraum TJ; Alazraki AL; Squires JH; Salter A; Podberesky DJ; Towbin AJ
Radiology; 2021 Apr; 299(1):190-199. PubMed ID: 33620289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR versus CEUS LI-RADS for Distinguishing Hepatocellular Carcinoma from other Hepatic Malignancies in High-Risk Patients.
Huang Z; Zhou P; Li S; Li K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 May; 47(5):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 33610338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LI-RADS for CT diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: performance of major and ancillary features.
Alhasan A; Cerny M; Olivié D; Billiard JS; Bergeron C; Brown K; Bodson-Clermont P; Castel H; Turcotte S; Perreault P; Tang A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):517-528. PubMed ID: 30167771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for the Characterization of Liver Nodules 20 mm or Smaller in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Huang JY; Li JW; Lu Q; Luo Y; Lin L; Shi YJ; Li T; Liu JB; Lyshchik A
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 31793849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System tumor-in-vein category: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim DH; Choi SH; Park SH; Kim KW; Byun JH; Kim SY; Lee SS; Choi JI
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2497-2506. PubMed ID: 33001305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Performance of the 2018 EASL vs. LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
Shin J; Lee S; Yoon JK; Roh YH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Dec; 58(6):1942-1950. PubMed ID: 37010244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cirrhotic liver: What's that nodule? The LI-RADS approach.
Shah A; Tang A; Santillan C; Sirlin C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):281-94. PubMed ID: 25996905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
