These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30445157)

  • 21. Structure of the bone-titanium interface in retrieved clinical oral implants.
    Sennerby L; Ericson LE; Thomsen P; Lekholm U; Astrand P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 1843463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
    Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analytical modeling of the interaction of an ultrasonic wave with a rough bone-implant interface.
    Hériveaux Y; Nguyen VH; Biwa S; Haïat G
    Ultrasonics; 2020 Dec; 108():106223. PubMed ID: 32771811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of implant surfaces on osseointegration.
    Novaes AB; de Souza SL; de Barros RR; Pereira KK; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(6):471-81. PubMed ID: 21271036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role of implants surface modification in osseointegration: A systematic review.
    Liu Y; Rath B; Tingart M; Eschweiler J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2020 Mar; 108(3):470-484. PubMed ID: 31664764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hard tissue implant interface.
    Albrektsson T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53 Suppl 1():S34-8. PubMed ID: 18498583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Porous PEEK improves the bone-implant interface compared to plasma-sprayed titanium coating on PEEK.
    Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Potter D; Safranski DL; Sulchek TA; Gall K; Guldberg RE
    Biomaterials; 2018 Dec; 185():106-116. PubMed ID: 30236838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration.
    Smeets R; Stadlinger B; Schwarz F; Beck-Broichsitter B; Jung O; Precht C; Kloss F; Gröbe A; Heiland M; Ebker T
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():6285620. PubMed ID: 27478833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: influence of the bone-implant interface properties.
    Mathieu V; Vayron R; Richard G; Lambert G; Naili S; Meningaud JP; Haiat G
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 24268798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term osseointegration of 3D printed CoCr constructs with an interconnected open-pore architecture prepared by electron beam melting.
    Shah FA; Omar O; Suska F; Snis A; Matic A; Emanuelsson L; Norlindh B; Lausmaa J; Thomsen P; Palmquist A
    Acta Biomater; 2016 May; 36():296-309. PubMed ID: 27000553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early molecular assessment of osseointegration in humans.
    Thalji GN; Nares S; Cooper LF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1273-1285. PubMed ID: 24118318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Establishment of an in vivo model for molecular assessment of titanium implant osseointegration in compromised bone.
    Vandamme K; Holy X; Bensidhoum M; Logeart-Avramoglou D; Naert I; Duyck J; Petite H
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2011 Mar; 17(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 20874261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surface Modification Techniques to Enhance Osseointegration of Spinal Implants.
    Possley D; Baker E; Baker K; Khalil JG
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Nov; 28(22):e988-e994. PubMed ID: 32868701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Osseointegration of 3D printed microalloyed CoCr implants-Addition of 0.04% Zr to CoCr does not alter bone material properties.
    Shah FA; Jergéus E; Chiba A; Palmquist A
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 Jun; 106(6):1655-1663. PubMed ID: 29427531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bone-implant interface strength and osseointegration: Biodegradable magnesium alloy versus standard titanium control.
    Castellani C; Lindtner RA; Hausbrandt P; Tschegg E; Stanzl-Tschegg SE; Zanoni G; Beck S; Weinberg AM
    Acta Biomater; 2011 Jan; 7(1):432-40. PubMed ID: 20804867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differential effect of hydroxyapatite nano-particle versus nano-rod decorated titanium micro-surface on osseointegration.
    Bai L; Liu Y; Du Z; Weng Z; Yao W; Zhang X; Huang X; Yao X; Crawford R; Hang R; Huang D; Tang B; Xiao Y
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Aug; 76():344-358. PubMed ID: 29908975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.
    Brunski JB
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():99-119. PubMed ID: 11276755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ultrastructure of the bone-cement and the bone-metal interface.
    Linder L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Mar; (276):147-56. PubMed ID: 1537145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regeneration of peri-implant infrabony defects using PerioGlas: a pilot study in rabbits.
    Johnson MW; Sullivan SM; Rohrer M; Collier M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):835-9. PubMed ID: 9425765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.
    Mosavar A; Ziaei A; Kadkhodaei M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26478976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.