These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30445166)

  • 21. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
    Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals.
    Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Innes NP
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Nov; 28(6):548-560. PubMed ID: 30070003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses.
    Zhang H; Han J; Zhu YB; Lau WY; Schwartz ME; Xie GQ; Dai SY; Shen YN; Wu MC; Shen F; Yang T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():4-16. PubMed ID: 26117439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Methodological quality of Meta-analyses regarding studies related to genetic association on papers published in Chinese journals].
    Li S; Fang K; Sun AY; Sun KX; Hu YH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 34(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 24331971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.
    Pastorino R; Milovanovic S; Stojanovic J; Efremov L; Amore R; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154217. PubMed ID: 27167982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of meta-analyses of observational studies published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang ZW; Cheng J; Liu Z; Ma JC; Li JL; Wang J; Yang KH
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008066. PubMed ID: 26644119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationships between abstract features and methodological quality explained variations of social media activity derived from systematic reviews about psoriasis interventions.
    Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Isla-Tejera B; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; Gómez-García F; García-Nieto AV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():35-43. PubMed ID: 29803759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Epidemiological characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus treatment: a systematic review.
    Wu XY; Lam VC; Yu YF; Ho RS; Feng Y; Wong CH; Yip BH; Tsoi KK; Wong SY; Chung VC
    Eur J Endocrinol; 2016 Nov; 175(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 27491373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.
    Adie S; Ma D; Harris IA; Naylor JM; Craig JC
    Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 25575252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methodological issues of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of sleep medicine: A meta-epidemiological study.
    Xu C; Furuya-Kanamori L; Kwong JSW; Li S; Liu Y; Doi SA
    Sleep Med Rev; 2021 Jun; 57():101434. PubMed ID: 33588267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality.
    Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Seehra J; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 24709031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characteristics and Methodological Quality of Meta-Analyses on Hypertension Treatments-A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Wu XY; Du XJ; Ho RS; Lee CC; Yip BH; Wong MC; Wong SY; Chung VC
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2017 Feb; 19(2):137-142. PubMed ID: 27495352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations.
    Papageorgiou SN; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):74-85. PubMed ID: 23493385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading gastroenterology and hepatology journals: A systematic review.
    Liu P; Qiu Y; Qian Y; Chen X; Wang Y; Cui J; Zhai X
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27600190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.
    Jin YH; Wang GH; Sun YR; Li Q; Zhao C; Li G; Si JH; Li Y; Lu C; Shang HC
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e011514. PubMed ID: 28186925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.