452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30445985)
41. Impact of microwave at X-band in the aetiology of male infertility.
Kumar S; Behari J; Sisodia R
Electromagn Biol Med; 2012 Sep; 31(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 22897403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Searching for the perfect wave: the effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cells.
Gherardini L; Ciuti G; Tognarelli S; Cinti C
Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Mar; 15(4):5366-87. PubMed ID: 24681584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cohort study on the effects of everyday life radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure on non-specific symptoms and tinnitus.
Frei P; Mohler E; Braun-Fahrländer C; Fröhlich J; Neubauer G; Röösli M;
Environ Int; 2012 Jan; 38(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 21982030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Are men talking their reproductive health away?
Agarwal A; Durairajanayagam D
Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(3):433-4. PubMed ID: 25432495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Association between mobile phone use and semen quality: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Liu K; Li Y; Zhang G; Liu J; Cao J; Ao L; Zhang S
Andrology; 2014 Jul; 2(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 24700791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Recent reports of Wi-Fi and mobile phone-induced radiation on oxidative stress and reproductive signaling pathways in females and males.
Nazıroğlu M; Yüksel M; Köse SA; Özkaya MO
J Membr Biol; 2013 Dec; 246(12):869-75. PubMed ID: 24105626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of the effect of using mobile phones on male fertility.
Wdowiak A; Wdowiak L; Wiktor H
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2007; 14(1):169-72. PubMed ID: 17655195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The effect of pulsed 900-MHz GSM mobile phone radiation on the acrosome reaction, head morphometry and zona binding of human spermatozoa.
Falzone N; Huyser C; Becker P; Leszczynski D; Franken DR
Int J Androl; 2011 Feb; 34(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 20236367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Real-world cell phone radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposures.
Wall S; Wang ZM; Kendig T; Dobraca D; Lipsett M
Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 171():581-592. PubMed ID: 30448205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Prioritizing health outcomes when assessing the effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A survey among experts.
Verbeek J; Oftedal G; Feychting M; van Rongen E; Rosaria Scarfì M; Mann S; Wong R; van Deventer E
Environ Int; 2021 Jan; 146():106300. PubMed ID: 33395944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Estimated all-day and evening whole-brain radiofrequency electromagnetic fields doses, and sleep in preadolescents.
Cabré-Riera A; van Wel L; Liorni I; Koopman-Verhoeff ME; Imaz L; Ibarluzea J; Huss A; Wiart J; Vermeulen R; Joseph W; Capstick M; Vrijheid M; Cardis E; Röösli M; Eeftens M; Thielens A; Tiemeier H; Guxens M
Environ Res; 2022 Mar; 204(Pt C):112291. PubMed ID: 34757029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum; 2013; 102(Pt 2):1-460. PubMed ID: 24772662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Direct and indirect effects of exposure to 900 MHz GSM radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on CHO cell line: Evidence of bystander effect by non-ionizing radiation.
Jooyan N; Goliaei B; Bigdeli B; Faraji-Dana R; Zamani A; Entezami M; Mortazavi SMJ
Environ Res; 2019 Jul; 174():176-187. PubMed ID: 31036329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Instruments to measure environmental and personal radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures: an update.
Bhatt CR; Henderson S; Brzozek C; Benke G
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Sep; 45(3):687-704. PubMed ID: 35737222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Estimates of Environmental Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and Risk of Lymphoma Subtypes.
Satta G; Mascia N; Serra T; Salis A; Saba L; Sanna S; Zucca MG; Angelucci E; Gabbas A; Culurgioni F; Pili P; Mura E; Cappai M; Ennas MG; Cocco P
Radiat Res; 2018 May; 189(5):541-547. PubMed ID: 29547352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure.
Frei P; Mohler E; Bürgi A; Fröhlich J; Neubauer G; Braun-Fahrländer C; Röösli M;
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19819523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The response of human bacteria to static magnetic field and radiofrequency electromagnetic field.
Crabtree DPE; Herrera BJ; Kang S
J Microbiol; 2017 Oct; 55(10):809-815. PubMed ID: 28956351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The effects of simultaneous combined exposure to CDMA and WCDMA electromagnetic fields on rat testicular function.
Lee HJ; Jin YB; Kim TH; Pack JK; Kim N; Choi HD; Lee JS; Lee YS
Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 May; 33(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 22012556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Personal RF-EMF exposure from mobile phone base stations during temporary events.
Ramirez-Vazquez R; Gonzalez-Rubio J; Arribas E; Najera A
Environ Res; 2019 Aug; 175():266-273. PubMed ID: 31146098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Rat fertility and embryo fetal development: influence of exposure to the Wi-Fi signal.
Poulletier de Gannes F; Billaudel B; Haro E; Taxile M; Le Montagner L; Hurtier A; Ait Aissa S; Masuda H; Percherancier Y; Ruffié G; Dufour P; Veyret B; Lagroye I
Reprod Toxicol; 2013 Apr; 36():1-5. PubMed ID: 23178895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
