These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30446171)
1. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Tanaka S; Kawaguchi Y; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Fuks D; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Gayet B; Wakabayashi G Surgery; 2019 Apr; 165(4):731-740. PubMed ID: 30446171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection. Kawaguchi Y; Tanaka S; Fuks D; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Kubo S; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G; Gayet B Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2056-2066. PubMed ID: 31338665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of IWATE, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, and Southampton Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Scoring Systems for Predicting Intra and Postoperative Outcomes in Robotic Hepatectomy. Sucandy I; Ross SB; Adorno Flores J; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A Am Surg; 2024 Jul; 90(7):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 38520138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the IMM classification in laparoscopic repeat liver resections for colorectal liver metastases. Hobeika C; Tribillon E; Marchese U; Faermark N; Ghedira A; Bonnet S; Nassar A; Gayet B; Fuks D Surgery; 2021 Nov; 170(5):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 34176600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification system for robotic liver resection. Sucandy I; Kang RD; Adorno J; Crespo K; Syblis C; Ross S; Rosemurgy A HPB (Oxford); 2023 Sep; 25(9):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 37217370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort. Barron JO; Orabi D; Moro A; Quintini C; Berber E; Aucejo FN; Sasaki K; Kwon CD Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3601-3609. PubMed ID: 34031739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relevance of blood loss as key indicator of the quality of surgical care in laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Nassar A; Hobeika C; Lamer C; Beaussier M; Sarran A; Yamazaki S; Sanou Y; Bonnet S; Gayet B; Fuks D Surgery; 2020 Sep; 168(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 32600884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of IWATE laparoscopic difficulty score on postoperative outcomes and costs for robotic hepatectomy: Are complex resections more expensive? Sucandy I; Vasanthakumar P; Ross SB; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; App S; Rosemurgy A J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2024 Jul; 31(7):446-454. PubMed ID: 38800881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection. Tanemura A; Mizuno S; Maeda K; Shinkai T; Ito T; Hayasaki A; Gyoten K; Fujii T; Iizawa Y; Murata Y; Kuriyama N; Kishiwada M; Sakurai H Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9054-9063. PubMed ID: 35831677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies. Goh BKP; Prieto M; Syn N; Koh YX; Teo JY; Lee SY; Chung AY; Chan CY HPB (Oxford); 2021 May; 23(5):770-776. PubMed ID: 33023824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan. Tanaka S; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Aug; 225(2):249-258.e1. PubMed ID: 28408311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: a 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study. Goh BKP; Syn N; Lee SY; Koh YX; Teo JY; Kam JH; Cheow PC; Jeyaraj PR; Chow PK; Ooi LL; Chung AY; Chan CY Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5231-5238. PubMed ID: 32974782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of the Iwate criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive liver resection. Krenzien F; Wabitsch S; Haber P; Kamali C; Brunnbauer P; Benzing C; Atanasov G; Wakabayashi G; Öllinger R; Pratschke J; Schmelzle M J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2018 Sep; 25(9):403-411. PubMed ID: 30076767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: The comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections. Tripke V; Huber T; Mittler J; Lang H; Heinrich S J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 Jul; 27(7):380-387. PubMed ID: 32162482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of the Iwate difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: do surgical outcomes differ for tumors in segments VI and VII? Choi SH; Chen KH; Syn NL; Cipriani F; Cheung TT; Chiow AKH; Choi GH; Siow TF; Sucandy I; Marino MV; Gastaca M; Chong CC; Lee JH; Ivanecz A; Mazzaferro V; Lopez-Ben S; Fondevila C; Rotellar F; Campos RR; Efanov M; Kingham TP; Sutcliffe RP; Troisi RI; Pratschke J; Wang X; D'Hondt M; Yong CC; Levi Sandri GB; Tang CN; Ruzzenente A; Cherqui D; Ferrero A; Wakabayashi G; Scatton O; Aghayan D; Edwin B; Coelho FF; Giuliante F; Liu R; Sijberden J; Abu Hilal M; Sugioka A; Long TCD; Fuks D; Aldrighetti L; Han HS; Goh BKP; Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9204-9214. PubMed ID: 35851819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Iwate Model for Predicting the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Does Tumor Size Matter? Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Ilijevec B; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jun; 25(6):1451-1460. PubMed ID: 32495139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Lin H; Bai Y; Yin M; Chen Z; Yu S Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3732-3749. PubMed ID: 34406470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection in Singapore: Analysis of 300 cases. Goh BK; Wang Z; Koh YX; Lim KI Ann Acad Med Singap; 2021 Oct; 50(10):742-750. PubMed ID: 34755168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revisiting the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Difficulty Classification of Laparoscopic Liver Resection with the Data from a Personal Series-Evaluations for the Difficulty of Left Medial Sectionectomy and Length of Hospital Stay. Morise Z J Pers Med; 2024 Feb; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 38540975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection. Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S; Krebs B BMC Surg; 2019 Nov; 19(1):179. PubMed ID: 31775813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]