180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30446171)
1. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.
Tanaka S; Kawaguchi Y; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Fuks D; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Gayet B; Wakabayashi G
Surgery; 2019 Apr; 165(4):731-740. PubMed ID: 30446171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection.
Kawaguchi Y; Tanaka S; Fuks D; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Kubo S; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G; Gayet B
Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2056-2066. PubMed ID: 31338665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of IWATE, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, and Southampton Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Scoring Systems for Predicting Intra and Postoperative Outcomes in Robotic Hepatectomy.
Sucandy I; Ross SB; Adorno Flores J; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A
Am Surg; 2024 Jul; 90(7):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 38520138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the IMM classification in laparoscopic repeat liver resections for colorectal liver metastases.
Hobeika C; Tribillon E; Marchese U; Faermark N; Ghedira A; Bonnet S; Nassar A; Gayet B; Fuks D
Surgery; 2021 Nov; 170(5):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 34176600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification system for robotic liver resection.
Sucandy I; Kang RD; Adorno J; Crespo K; Syblis C; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
HPB (Oxford); 2023 Sep; 25(9):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 37217370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.
Barron JO; Orabi D; Moro A; Quintini C; Berber E; Aucejo FN; Sasaki K; Kwon CD
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3601-3609. PubMed ID: 34031739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relevance of blood loss as key indicator of the quality of surgical care in laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.
Nassar A; Hobeika C; Lamer C; Beaussier M; Sarran A; Yamazaki S; Sanou Y; Bonnet S; Gayet B; Fuks D
Surgery; 2020 Sep; 168(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 32600884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.
Tanemura A; Mizuno S; Maeda K; Shinkai T; Ito T; Hayasaki A; Gyoten K; Fujii T; Iizawa Y; Murata Y; Kuriyama N; Kishiwada M; Sakurai H
Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9054-9063. PubMed ID: 35831677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies.
Goh BKP; Prieto M; Syn N; Koh YX; Teo JY; Lee SY; Chung AY; Chan CY
HPB (Oxford); 2021 May; 23(5):770-776. PubMed ID: 33023824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan.
Tanaka S; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G
J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Aug; 225(2):249-258.e1. PubMed ID: 28408311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: a 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study.
Goh BKP; Syn N; Lee SY; Koh YX; Teo JY; Kam JH; Cheow PC; Jeyaraj PR; Chow PK; Ooi LL; Chung AY; Chan CY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5231-5238. PubMed ID: 32974782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of the Iwate criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive liver resection.
Krenzien F; Wabitsch S; Haber P; Kamali C; Brunnbauer P; Benzing C; Atanasov G; Wakabayashi G; Öllinger R; Pratschke J; Schmelzle M
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2018 Sep; 25(9):403-411. PubMed ID: 30076767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: The comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections.
Tripke V; Huber T; Mittler J; Lang H; Heinrich S
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 Jul; 27(7):380-387. PubMed ID: 32162482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of the Iwate difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: do surgical outcomes differ for tumors in segments VI and VII?
Choi SH; Chen KH; Syn NL; Cipriani F; Cheung TT; Chiow AKH; Choi GH; Siow TF; Sucandy I; Marino MV; Gastaca M; Chong CC; Lee JH; Ivanecz A; Mazzaferro V; Lopez-Ben S; Fondevila C; Rotellar F; Campos RR; Efanov M; Kingham TP; Sutcliffe RP; Troisi RI; Pratschke J; Wang X; D'Hondt M; Yong CC; Levi Sandri GB; Tang CN; Ruzzenente A; Cherqui D; Ferrero A; Wakabayashi G; Scatton O; Aghayan D; Edwin B; Coelho FF; Giuliante F; Liu R; Sijberden J; Abu Hilal M; Sugioka A; Long TCD; Fuks D; Aldrighetti L; Han HS; Goh BKP;
Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9204-9214. PubMed ID: 35851819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Iwate Model for Predicting the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Does Tumor Size Matter?
Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Ilijevec B; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jun; 25(6):1451-1460. PubMed ID: 32495139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lin H; Bai Y; Yin M; Chen Z; Yu S
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3732-3749. PubMed ID: 34406470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection in Singapore: Analysis of 300 cases.
Goh BK; Wang Z; Koh YX; Lim KI
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2021 Oct; 50(10):742-750. PubMed ID: 34755168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revisiting the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Difficulty Classification of Laparoscopic Liver Resection with the Data from a Personal Series-Evaluations for the Difficulty of Left Medial Sectionectomy and Length of Hospital Stay.
Morise Z
J Pers Med; 2024 Feb; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 38540975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.
Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S; Krebs B
BMC Surg; 2019 Nov; 19(1):179. PubMed ID: 31775813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pure abdominal laparoscopic approach versus thoraco-abdominal laparoscopic approach: What is the best technique for liver resection in segment 7 and segment 8? An answer from the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris experience with short- and long-term outcome evaluation.
Mazzotta AD; Carneiro AC; Tribillon E; Kawaguchi Y; Gayet B; Soubrane O
Surgery; 2023 May; 173(5):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 36669939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
