180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30446466)
1. Impact of metabolic syndrome on oncologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy.
Morlacco A; Dal Moro F; Rangel LJ; Carlson RE; Schulte PJ; Jeffrey KR
Urol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):528.e1-528.e6. PubMed ID: 30446466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of Metabolic Syndrome on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy in a Low-risk Prostate Cancer Cohort Potentially Eligible for Active Surveillance.
Colicchia M; Morlacco A; Rangel LJ; Carlson RE; Dal Moro F; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):425-432. PubMed ID: 29306730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Metabolic Syndrome on Prostate Cancer Stage, Grade, and Overall Recurrence Risk in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Bhindi B; Xie WY; Kulkarni GS; Hamilton RJ; Nesbitt M; Finelli A; Zlotta AR; Evans A; van der Kwast TH; Alibhai SM; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner NE
Urology; 2016 Jul; 93():77-85. PubMed ID: 27015944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metabolic syndrome and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are associated with adverse pathological features in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy.
Lebdai S; Mathieu R; Leger J; Haillot O; Vincendeau S; Rioux-Leclercq N; Fournier G; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Doucet L; Azzouzi AR; Rigaud J; Renaudin K; Charles T; Bruyere F; Fromont G
Urol Oncol; 2018 Feb; 36(2):80.e17-80.e24. PubMed ID: 29153942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic implications of 2005 Gleason grade modification. Population-based study of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Thomsen FB; Folkvaljon Y; Brasso K; Loeb S; Robinson D; Egevad L; Stattin P
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Nov; 114(6):664-670. PubMed ID: 27511833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Preoperative Risk Group Stratification on Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Adverse Pathologic Findings at Radical Prostatectomy.
Jang WS; Kim LH; Yoon CY; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Ham WS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164497. PubMed ID: 27716842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative Statin Use at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy Is Not Associated With Biochemical Recurrence or Pathologic Upgrading.
Lyon TD; Turner RM; Yabes JG; Woldemichael E; Davies BJ; Jacobs BL; Nelson JB
Urology; 2016 Nov; 97():153-159. PubMed ID: 27516122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The metabolic syndrome is associated with more aggressive prostate cancer.
Ozbek E; Otunctemur A; Dursun M; Sahin S; Besiroglu H; Koklu I; Erkoc M; Danis E; Bozkurt M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(9):4029-32. PubMed ID: 24935591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low circulating free and bioavailable testosterone levels as predictors of high-grade tumors in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Léon P; Seisen T; Cussenot O; Drouin SJ; Cattarino S; Compérat E; Renard-Penna R; Mozer P; Bitker MO; Rouprêt M
Urol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 33(9):384.e21-7. PubMed ID: 25595576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
Wadhwa H; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Abern MR
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of upgrading and upstaging in patients with prostate cancer on biopsy: a radical prostatectomy multicenter cohort study.
De Nunzio C; Brassetti A; Simone G; Lombardo R; Mastroianni R; Collura D; Muto G; Gallucci M; Tubaro A
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Sep; 21(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 29867154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease.
Badani KK; Reddy BN; Moskowitz EJ; Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Martini A; Whalen MJ; Skarecky DW; Huynh LM; Ahlering TE
Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):310.e1-310.e6. PubMed ID: 29625782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
