These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30446969)

  • 1. Prior experience informs ensemble encoding.
    Crawford LE; Corbin JC; Landy D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):993-1000. PubMed ID: 30446969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinct contributions of attention and working memory to visual statistical learning and ensemble processing.
    Hall MG; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1112-23. PubMed ID: 26010589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. It goes with the territory: Ownership across spatial boundaries.
    Strachan JWA; Constable MD; Knoblich G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):789-797. PubMed ID: 32271083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misremembering emotion: Inductive category effects for complex emotional stimuli.
    Corbin JC; Crawford LE; Vavra DT
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):691-698. PubMed ID: 28138942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least).
    Emberson LL; Rubinstein DY
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():63-78. PubMed ID: 27139779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual statistical learning can drive object-based attentional selection.
    Zhao L; Cosman JD; Vatterott DB; Gupta P; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2240-8. PubMed ID: 24935806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning multisensory representations for auditory-visual transfer of sequence category knowledge: a probabilistic language of thought approach.
    Yildirim I; Jacobs RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):673-86. PubMed ID: 25338656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidental auditory category learning.
    Gabay Y; Dick FK; Zevin JD; Holt LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1124-38. PubMed ID: 26010588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual history biases in serial ensemble representation.
    Khayat N; Ahissar M; Hochstein S
    J Vis; 2023 Mar; 23(3):7. PubMed ID: 36920389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating grounded conceptualization: Stimulus-response compatibility for tool handles is due to spatial attention.
    Matheson HE; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):441-457. PubMed ID: 30816789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual, haptic and crossmodal recognition of scenes.
    Newell FN; Woods AT; Mernagh M; Bülthoff HH
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 161(2):233-42. PubMed ID: 15490135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.
    De Bellis F; Ferrara A; Errico D; Panico F; Sagliano L; Conson M; Trojano L
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26358123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Object permanence and method of disappearance: looking measures further contradict reaching measures.
    Charles EP; Rivera SM
    Dev Sci; 2009 Nov; 12(6):991-1006. PubMed ID: 19840053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grasping spheres, not planets.
    Taylor LJ; Zwaan RA
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 20022594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: experimental and computational studies.
    Yildirim I; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2013 Feb; 126(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 23102553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mean size as a unit of visual working memory.
    Im HY; Chong SC
    Perception; 2014; 43(7):663-76. PubMed ID: 25223110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: support for a probability-matching account.
    Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1365-76. PubMed ID: 22545608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical organization in visual working memory: From global ensemble to individual object structure.
    Nie QY; Müller HJ; Conci M
    Cognition; 2017 Feb; 159():85-96. PubMed ID: 27914301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Neural Dynamics of Attentional Selection in Natural Scenes.
    Kaiser D; Oosterhof NN; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 36(41):10522-10528. PubMed ID: 27733605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.