These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30447098)

  • 21. In silico approaches to explore toxicity end points: issues and concerns for estimating human health effects.
    Matthews EJ; Contrera JF
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2007 Feb; 3(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 17269899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nontest Methods to Predict Acute Toxicity: State of the Art for Applications of In Silico Methods.
    Bureau R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():519-534. PubMed ID: 29934909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Polymers Used in US Household Cleaning Products: Assessment of Data Availability for Ecological Risk Assessment.
    Pecquet A; McAvoy D; Pittinger C; Stanton K
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jul; 15(4):621-632. PubMed ID: 30908881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evolution of the international workshops on quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in environmental toxicology.
    Kaiser KL
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):3-20. PubMed ID: 17365955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Utilizing relative potency factors (RPF) and threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concepts to assess hazard and human risk assessment profiles of environmental metabolites: a case study.
    Terry C; Rasoulpour RJ; Knowles S; Billington R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 25584438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances.
    Cronin MT; Walker JD; Jaworska JS; Comber MH; Watts CD; Worth AP
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Aug; 111(10):1376-90. PubMed ID: 12896861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Internal and external validation of the long-term QSARs for neutral organics to fish from ECOSAR™.
    de Haas EM; Eikelboom T; Bouwman T
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2011; 22(5-6):545-59. PubMed ID: 21732893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of artificial neural networks in the QSAR prediction of physicochemical properties and toxicities for REACH legislation.
    Dearden JC; Rowe PH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1260():65-88. PubMed ID: 25502376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recommended approaches to the scientific evaluation of ecotoxicological hazards and risks of endocrine-active substances.
    Matthiessen P; Ankley GT; Biever RC; Bjerregaard P; Borgert C; Brugger K; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Coady KK; Constantine L; Dang Z; Denslow ND; Dreier DA; Dungey S; Gray LE; Gross M; Guiney PD; Hecker M; Holbech H; Iguchi T; Kadlec S; Karouna-Renier NK; Katsiadaki I; Kawashima Y; Kloas W; Krueger H; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Leopold A; Levine SL; Maack G; Marty S; Meador J; Mihaich E; Odum J; Ortego L; Parrott J; Pickford D; Roberts M; Schaefers C; Schwarz T; Solomon K; Verslycke T; Weltje L; Wheeler JR; Williams M; Wolf JC; Yamazaki K
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):267-279. PubMed ID: 28127947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Arguments for considering uncertainty in QSAR predictions in hazard and risk assessments.
    Sahlin U; Golsteijn L; Iqbal MS; Peijnenburg W
    Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):91-110. PubMed ID: 23614547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative structure-activity relationship methods: perspectives on drug discovery and toxicology.
    Perkins R; Fang H; Tong W; Welsh WJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1666-79. PubMed ID: 12924569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Approaches to advancing quantitative human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals in the post-genomic era.
    Chiu WA; Euling SY; Scott CS; Subramaniam RP
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Sep; 271(3):309-23. PubMed ID: 20353796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Population-relevant endpoints in the evaluation of endocrine-active substances (EAS) for ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment.
    Marty MS; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Constantine L; Kloas W; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Meador J; Pickford D; Schwarz T; Verslycke T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):317-330. PubMed ID: 28052490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative structure-activity relationship to predict acute fish toxicity of organic solvents.
    Levet A; Bordes C; Clément Y; Mignon P; Chermette H; Marote P; Cren-Olivé C; Lantéri P
    Chemosphere; 2013 Oct; 93(6):1094-103. PubMed ID: 23866172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An evaluation of global QSAR models for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis.
    Enoch SJ; Cronin MT; Schultz TW; Madden JC
    Chemosphere; 2008 Apr; 71(7):1225-32. PubMed ID: 18261763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Toxicity in relation to mode of action for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Acute-to-chronic ratios and quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Ristau K; Akgül Y; Bartel AS; Fremming J; Müller MT; Reiher L; Stapela F; Splett JP; Spann N
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2347-53. PubMed ID: 25994998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. European Chemicals Agency dossier submissions as an experimental data source: refinement of a fish toxicity model for predicting acute LC50 values.
    Austin T; Denoyelle M; Chaudry A; Stradling S; Eadsforth C
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Feb; 34(2):369-78. PubMed ID: 25470737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. QSARs in ecotoxicological risk assessment.
    de Roode D; Hoekzema C; de Vries-Buitenweg S; van de Waart B; van der Hoeven J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 45(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 16529851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.