These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30447519)

  • 1. Nonlinear decision weights or moment-based preferences? A model competition involving described and experienced skewness.
    Spiliopoulos L; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():99-123. PubMed ID: 30447519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variance, skewness and multiple outcomes in described and experienced prospects: Can one descriptive model capture it all?
    Spiliopoulos L; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Apr; 152(4):1188-1222. PubMed ID: 36442037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explaining the description-experience gap in risky decision-making: learning and memory retention during experience as causal mechanisms.
    Haines N; Kvam PD; Turner BM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 23(3):557-577. PubMed ID: 37291409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys.
    Genest W; Stauffer WR; Schultz W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(30):8402-7. PubMed ID: 27402743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How (in)variant are subjective representations of described and experienced risk and rewards?
    Kellen D; Pachur T; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():126-138. PubMed ID: 27620961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The boundaries of instance-based learning theory for explaining decisions from experience.
    Gonzalez C
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():73-98. PubMed ID: 23317827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to Change the Weight of Rare Events in Decisions From Experience.
    Hotaling JM; Jarvstad A; Donkin C; Newell BR
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1767-1779. PubMed ID: 31725348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reward skewness coding in the insula independent of probability and loss.
    Burke CJ; Tobler PN
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Nov; 106(5):2415-22. PubMed ID: 21849610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk.
    Trepel C; Fox CR; Poldrack RA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15795132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exaggerated risk: prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Ayton P; Dent J; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1487-505. PubMed ID: 19857019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision analysis with cumulative prospect theory.
    Bayoumi AM; Redelmeier DA
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 11059473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human representation of multimodal distributions as clusters of samples.
    Sun J; Li J; Zhang H
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 May; 15(5):e1007047. PubMed ID: 31086374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding clinical and non-clinical decisions under uncertainty: a scenario-based survey.
    ; Simianu VV; Grounds MA; Joslyn SL; LeClerc JE; Ehlers AP; Agrawal N; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Flaxman AD; Flum DR
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Dec; 16(1):153. PubMed ID: 27905926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition.
    Hilbig BE; Glöckner A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Nov; 138(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 21974869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk Taking with Left- and Right-Skewed Lotteries
    Bougherara D; Friesen L; Nauges C
    J Risk Uncertain; 2021; 62(1):89-112. PubMed ID: 33967390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice.
    Glöckner A; Hilbig BE; Henninger F; Fiedler S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Apr; 145(4):486-508. PubMed ID: 26974209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of information search and its influence on risk preferences.
    Kopsacheilis O
    Theory Decis; 2018; 84(3):311-339. PubMed ID: 31258207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of memory in distinguishing risky decisions from experience and description.
    Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 27602887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making?
    Cohen BJ
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8717589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequent winners explain apparent skewness preferences in experience-based decisions.
    Olschewski S; Spektor MS; Le Mens G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(12):e2317751121. PubMed ID: 38489382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.