306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30447840)
1. Updates on Grading and Staging of Prostate Cancer.
Braunhut BL; Punnen S; Kryvenko ON
Surg Pathol Clin; 2018 Dec; 11(4):759-774. PubMed ID: 30447840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate Biopsy Specimens With Gleason 3+3=6 and Intraductal Carcinoma: Radical Prostatectomy Findings and Clinical Outcomes.
Khani F; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 39(10):1383-9. PubMed ID: 26076065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Biopsy for Detecting Cribriform Gleason Pattern 4 Carcinoma and Intraductal Carcinoma in Paired Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Ericson KJ; Wu SS; Lundy SD; Thomas LJ; Klein EA; McKenney JK
J Urol; 2020 Feb; 203(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 31483693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate without invasive carcinoma on needle biopsy: emphasis on radical prostatectomy findings.
Robinson BD; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1328-33. PubMed ID: 20723921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distinction between intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), high-grade dysplasia (PIN), and invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma, using molecular markers of cancer progression.
Dawkins HJ; Sellner LN; Turbett GR; Thompson CA; Redmond SL; McNeal JE; Cohen RJ
Prostate; 2000 Sep; 44(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 10951489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical Intraductal Cribriform Proliferations of the Prostate Exhibit Similar Molecular and Clinicopathologic Characteristics as Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate.
Hickman RA; Yu H; Li J; Kong M; Shah RB; Zhou M; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):550-556. PubMed ID: 28009609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Essential Updates in Grading, Morphotyping, Reporting, and Staging of Prostate Carcinoma for General Surgical Pathologists.
Paner GP; Gandhi J; Choy B; Amin MB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 May; 143(5):550-564. PubMed ID: 30865487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Grading Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate; ISUP versus GUPS Recommendations.
Shahid A; Mushtaq S; Maqbool H; Hassan U; Hussain M; Syed M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Apr; 33(4):396-399. PubMed ID: 37190710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolution in Prostate Cancer Staging: Pathology Updates From AJCC 8th Edition and Opportunities That Remain.
Fine SW
Adv Anat Pathol; 2018 Sep; 25(5):327-332. PubMed ID: 29870405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Fine SW; Amin MB; Berney DM; Bjartell A; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Humphrey PA; Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Stief C
Eur Urol; 2012 Jul; 62(1):20-39. PubMed ID: 22421083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of limited (tertiary) Gleason pattern 5 on the new prostate cancer grade groups.
Baras AS; Nelson JB; Han M; Parwani AV; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2017 May; 63():27-32. PubMed ID: 27993581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance and outcome of nuclear anaplasia and mitotic index in prostatic adenocarcinomas.
Kır G; Sarbay BC; Gumus E
Urol Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):430.e9-430.e16. PubMed ID: 27264167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer - major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.
Buyyounouski MK; Choyke PL; McKenney JK; Sartor O; Sandler HM; Amin MB; Kattan MW; Lin DW
CA Cancer J Clin; 2017 May; 67(3):245-253. PubMed ID: 28222223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small cell-like change in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, intraductal carcinoma, and invasive prostatic carcinoma: a study of 7 cases.
Lee S; Han JS; Chang A; Ross HM; Montironi R; Yorukoglu K; Lane Z; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2013 Mar; 44(3):427-31. PubMed ID: 23026197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
