These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30448087)

  • 1. Fight load index and body composition are most associated with combat fitness in female Marines.
    Allison KF; Keenan KA; Lovalekar M; Mi Q; Beals K; Coleman LCLC; Nindl BC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Apr; 22(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 30448087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Greater ankle strength, anaerobic and aerobic capacity, and agility predict Ground Combat Military Occupational School graduation in female Marines.
    Allison KF; Keenan KA; Wohleber MF; Perlsweig KA; Pletcher ER; Lovalekar M; Beals K; Coleman LC; Nindl BC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S85-S90. PubMed ID: 28899656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decreased Percent Body Fat but Not Body Mass is Associated with Better Performance on Combat Fitness Test in Male and Female Marines.
    Pletcher ER; Lovalekar M; Coleman LC; Beals K; Nindl BC; Allison KF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2023 Apr; 37(4):887-893. PubMed ID: 36026495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unsupervised Machine Learning in Countermovement Jump and Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull Performance Produces Distinct Combat and Physical Fitness Clusters in Male and Female U.S. Marine Corps Recruits.
    Peterson PA; Lovalekar M; Cruz DE; Steele E; McFadden B; Cintineo H; Arent SM; Nindl BC
    Mil Med; 2024 Jun; 189(Supplement_2):38-46. PubMed ID: 38920035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.
    Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Musculoskeletal, biomechanical, and physiological gender differences in the US military.
    Allison KF; Keenan KA; Sell TC; Abt JP; Nagai T; Deluzio J; McGrail M; Lephart SM
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():22-32. PubMed ID: 26101903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results.
    Keefer M; Debeliso M
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2020; 13(4):1741-1755. PubMed ID: 33414879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preparing for Combat Readiness for the Fight: Physical Performance Profile of Female U.S. Marines.
    Kelly KR; Jameson JT
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Mar; 30(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 26605806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
    Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Less body fat improves physical and physiological performance in army soldiers.
    Crawford K; Fleishman K; Abt JP; Sell TC; Lovalekar M; Nagai T; Deluzio J; Rowe RS; McGrail MA; Lephart SM
    Mil Med; 2011 Jan; 176(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 21305957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lower-body muscular power predicts performance on urban combat simulation.
    Sankari M; Vaara JP; Pihlainen K; Ojanen T; Kyröläinen H
    Work; 2024; 77(4):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 38517830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical Training Strategies for Military Women's Performance Optimization in Combat-Centric Occupations.
    Nindl BC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S101-6. PubMed ID: 26506171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Associations of Physical Fitness and Body Composition Characteristics With Simulated Military Task Performance.
    Pihlainen K; Santtila M; Häkkinen K; Kyröläinen H
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1089-1098. PubMed ID: 28549046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The 300 Marines: characterizing the US Marines with perfect scores on their physical and combat fitness tests.
    Looney DP; Potter AW; Schafer EA; Chapman CL; Friedl KE
    Front Physiol; 2024; 15():1406749. PubMed ID: 38957215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Age and Military Service on Strength and Physiological Characteristics of U.S. Army Soldiers.
    Abt JP; Perlsweig K; Nagai T; Sell TC; Wirt MD; Lephart SM
    Mil Med; 2016 Feb; 181(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 26837087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical, Physiological, and Dietary Comparisons Between Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command Critical Skills Operators and Enablers.
    Royer SD; Thomas DT; Winters JD; Abt JP; Best S; Poploski KM; Zalaiskalns A; Lephart SM
    Mil Med; 2018 Nov; 183(11-12):e341-e347. PubMed ID: 29635381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Operational Physical Performance and Fitness in Military Women: Physiological, Musculoskeletal Injury, and Optimized Physical Training Considerations for Successfully Integrating Women Into Combat-Centric Military Occupations.
    Nindl BC; Jones BH; Van Arsdale SJ; Kelly K; Kraemer WJ
    Mil Med; 2016 Jan; 181(1 Suppl):50-62. PubMed ID: 26741902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Body Composition, Load-Velocity Profiles, and Sex-Related Differences on Army Combat Fitness Test Performance.
    Boffey D; DiPrima JA; Kendall KL; Hill EC; Stout JR; Fukuda DH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2023 Dec; 37(12):2467-2476. PubMed ID: 38015736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concept for a Predeployment Assessment of Basic Military Fitness in the German Armed Forces.
    Rohde U; Sievert A; Rüther T; Witzki A; Leyk D
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S211-5. PubMed ID: 26506190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential recovery rates of fitness following U.S. Army Ranger training.
    Conkright WR; Barringer ND; Lescure PB; Feeney KA; Smith MA; Nindl BC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2020 May; 23(5):529-534. PubMed ID: 31870679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.