These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30448993)

  • 41. Environmental estrogens in an urban aquatic ecosystem: II. Biological effects.
    Schultz MM; Minarik TA; Martinovic-Weigelt D; Curran EM; Bartell SE; Schoenfuss HL
    Environ Int; 2013 Nov; 61():138-49. PubMed ID: 24029288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. US cities can manage national hydrology and biodiversity using local infrastructure policy.
    McManamay RA; Surendran Nair S; DeRolph CR; Ruddell BL; Morton AM; Stewart RN; Troia MJ; Tran L; Kim H; Bhaduri BL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):9581-9586. PubMed ID: 28827332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Why wastewater treatment fails to protect stream ecosystems in Europe.
    Büttner O; Jawitz JW; Birk S; Borchardt D
    Water Res; 2022 Jun; 217():118382. PubMed ID: 35413560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Procedure for emergetic assessment in urban river de-pollution.
    Flausino FR; de Oliveira Neto GC; Librantz AFH
    Water Sci Technol; 2023 Oct; 88(8):2068-2080. PubMed ID: 37906459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Hydromorphological and socio-cultural assessment of urban rivers to promote nature-based solutions in Jarabacoa, Dominican Republic.
    Pradilla G; Lamberty G; Hamhaber J
    Ambio; 2021 Aug; 50(8):1414-1430. PubMed ID: 34061346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Biological assessment of urban and agricultural streams in the California Central Valley.
    Bacey J; Spurlock F
    Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Jul; 130(1-3):483-93. PubMed ID: 17072545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ecological Status of a Patagonian Mountain River: Usefulness of Environmental and Biotic Metrics for Rehabilitation Assessment.
    Laura MM; Adriana MK; Cecilia B; La Ludmila M; Cecilia PY; Gabriela P; José B
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 57(6):1166-87. PubMed ID: 26961305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance-The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive.
    Newig J; Schulz D; Jager NW
    Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 58(6):998-1014. PubMed ID: 27650440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biomonitoring of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams in Europe: Current practice and priorities to enhance ecological status assessments.
    Stubbington R; Chadd R; Cid N; Csabai Z; Miliša M; Morais M; Munné A; Pařil P; Pešić V; Tziortzis I; Verdonschot RCM; Datry T
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Mar; 618():1096-1113. PubMed ID: 29074240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Restoration as mitigation: analysis of stream mitigation for coal mining impacts in southern Appalachia.
    Palmer MA; Hondula KL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10552-60. PubMed ID: 25133756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: lessons learned.
    Hall TJ; Fisher RP; Rodgers JH; Minshall GW; Landis WG; Kovacs T; Firth BK; Dubé MG; Flinders CA; Deardorff TL; Borton DL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 19115805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessing the ecological status in the context of the European Water Framework Directive: where do we go now?
    Reyjol Y; Argillier C; Bonne W; Borja A; Buijse AD; Cardoso AC; Daufresne M; Kernan M; Ferreira MT; Poikane S; Prat N; Solheim AL; Stroffek S; Usseglio-Polatera P; Villeneuve B; van de Bund W
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():332-344. PubMed ID: 25146904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The paradox of expert judgment in rivers ecological monitoring.
    Feio MJ; Calapez AR; Elias CL; Cortes RM; Graça MA; Pinto P; Almeida SF
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 3):609-616. PubMed ID: 27784580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Managing aquatic ecosystems and water resources under multiple stress--an introduction to the MARS project.
    Hering D; Carvalho L; Argillier C; Beklioglu M; Borja A; Cardoso AC; Duel H; Ferreira T; Globevnik L; Hanganu J; Hellsten S; Jeppesen E; Kodeš V; Solheim AL; Nõges T; Ormerod S; Panagopoulos Y; Schmutz S; Venohr M; Birk S
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jan; 503-504():10-21. PubMed ID: 25017638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Environment and Spatial Influences on Aquatic Insect Communities in Cerrado Streams: the Relative Importance of Conductivity, Altitude, and Conservation Areas.
    Godoy BS; Queiroz LL; Lodi S; Oliveira LG
    Neotrop Entomol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 27909952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The impact of cattle access on ecological water quality in streams: Examples from agricultural catchments within Ireland.
    Conroy E; Turner JN; Rymszewicz A; O'Sullivan JJ; Bruen M; Lawler D; Lally H; Kelly-Quinn M
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Mar; 547():17-29. PubMed ID: 26780128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms.
    Battin TJ; Besemer K; Bengtsson MM; Romani AM; Packmann AI
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2016 Apr; 14(4):251-63. PubMed ID: 26972916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ecological relevance of biomarkers in monitoring studies of macro-invertebrates and fish in Mediterranean rivers.
    Colin N; Porte C; Fernandes D; Barata C; Padrós F; Carrassón M; Monroy M; Cano-Rocabayera O; de Sostoa A; Piña B; Maceda-Veiga A
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 540():307-23. PubMed ID: 26148426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Landscape characteristics of a stream and wetland mitigation banking program.
    BenDor T; Sholtes J; Doyle MW
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Dec; 19(8):2078-92. PubMed ID: 20014580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The presence of non-native species is not associated with native fish sensitivity to water pollution in greatly hydrologically altered rivers.
    Maceda-Veiga A; Mac Nally R; de Sostoa A
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 607-608():549-557. PubMed ID: 28709090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.