These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30449531)

  • 1. Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights.
    Price RB; Brown V; Siegle GJ
    Biol Psychiatry; 2019 Apr; 85(7):606-612. PubMed ID: 30449531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test-retest reliability and validity.
    Aday JS; Carlson JM
    Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 30171401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the psychometric properties of dot-probe attention measures using response-based computation.
    Evans TC; Britton JC
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2018 Sep; 60():95-103. PubMed ID: 29580549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest reliability of attention bias for food: Robust eye-tracking and reaction time indices.
    van Ens W; Schmidt U; Campbell IC; Roefs A; Werthmann J
    Appetite; 2019 May; 136():86-92. PubMed ID: 30682381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy and mechanisms underlying a gamified attention bias modification training in anxious youth: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Linke JO; Jones E; Pagliaccio D; Swetlitz C; Lewis KM; Silverman WK; Bar-Haim Y; Pine DS; Brotman MA
    BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Aug; 19(1):246. PubMed ID: 31391027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability measures in the dot-probe task among people with social anxiety disorder.
    Molloy A; Anderson PL
    Psychol Assess; 2020 Sep; 32(9):883-888. PubMed ID: 32525343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A meta-analysis of bias at baseline in RCTs of attention bias modification: No evidence for dot-probe bias towards threat in clinical anxiety and PTSD.
    Kruijt AW; Parsons S; Fox E
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Aug; 128(6):563-573. PubMed ID: 31368735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research.
    Price RB; Kuckertz JM; Siegle GJ; Ladouceur CD; Silk JS; Ryan ND; Dahl RE; Amir N
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):365-76. PubMed ID: 25419646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biobehavioral Markers of Attention Bias Modification in Temperamental Risk for Anxiety: A Randomized Control Trial.
    Liu P; Taber-Thomas BC; Fu X; Pérez-Edgar KE
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2018 Feb; 57(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 29413142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?
    McNally RJ
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2019 Apr; 69():4-13. PubMed ID: 29853421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patterns of attention to threat across tasks in behaviorally inhibited children at risk for anxiety.
    Morales S; Taber-Thomas BC; Pérez-Edgar KE
    Dev Sci; 2017 Mar; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 26786586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of the diffusion model on dot-probe task performance in children with behavioral inhibition.
    Wise S; Huang-Pollock C; Pérez-Edgar K
    Psychol Res; 2022 Apr; 86(3):831-843. PubMed ID: 34047824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial expression movement enhances the measurement of temporal dynamics of attentional bias in the dot-probe task.
    Caudek C; Ceccarini F; Sica C
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Aug; 95():58-70. PubMed ID: 28544892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face processing in adolescents with positive and negative threat bias.
    Sylvester CM; Petersen SE; Luby JL; Barch DM
    Psychol Med; 2017 Apr; 47(5):800-809. PubMed ID: 27873557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Home-delivered attention bias modification training via smartphone to improve attention control in sub-clinical generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized, controlled multi-session experiment.
    Teng MH; Hou YM; Chang SH; Cheng HJ
    J Affect Disord; 2019 Mar; 246():444-451. PubMed ID: 30599367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention training to pleasant stimuli in anxiety.
    Sass SM; Evans TC; Xiong K; Mirghassemi F; Tran H
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jan; 122():80-92. PubMed ID: 26969581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional bias modification in reducing test anxiety vulnerability: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cai W; Pan Y; Chai H; Cui Y; Yan J; Dong W; Deng G
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 29304757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced neural reactivity and selective attention to threat in anxiety.
    Eldar S; Yankelevitch R; Lamy D; Bar-Haim Y
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 20655976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task: A systematic review.
    Torrence RD; Troup LJ
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jun; 55(6):e13051. PubMed ID: 29266532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a novel attentional bias modification task: the future may be in the cards.
    Notebaert L; Clarke PJ; Grafton B; MacLeod C
    Behav Res Ther; 2015 Feb; 65():93-100. PubMed ID: 25594940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.