These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30449540)
1. Nonhuman biota dose rate estimation from liquid effluent releases during normal operations of light water reactors using the LADTAP II computer code. Kamboj S J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():141-149. PubMed ID: 30449540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of dose rate to terrestrial biota in the area around coal fired power plant applying ERICA tool and RESRAD BIOTA code. Ćujić M; Dragović S J Environ Radioact; 2018 Aug; 188():108-114. PubMed ID: 28964597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiological effluents released and public doses from nuclear power plants in Korea. Son JK; Kim HG; Kong TY; Ko JH; Lee GJ Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 23509396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of dose rates to non-human biota from radioactive discharges from Sellafield Ltd. using PC-CREAM. Smith J; Anderson T; Kliaus V J Environ Radioact; 2023 Dec; 270():107266. PubMed ID: 37659175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of the new wildlife transfer factors on RESRAD-BIOTA's screening Biota Concentration Guides and previous model comparison studies. Yu C; Cheng JJ; Kamboj S J Environ Radioact; 2013 Dec; 126():338-51. PubMed ID: 23455002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic modelling of radionuclide uptake by marine biota: application to the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. Vives i Batlle J J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():502-11. PubMed ID: 25773012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Derivation of a screening methodology for evaluating radiation dose to aquatic and terrestrial biota. Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ; Kocher DC J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):41-59. PubMed ID: 12590069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening level dose assessment of aquatic biota downstream of the Marcoule nuclear complex in southern France. St-Pierre S; Chambers DB; Lowe LM; Bontoux JG Health Phys; 1999 Sep; 77(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 10456504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The assessment of ionising radiation impact on the cooling pond freshwater ecosystem non-human biota from the Ignalina NPP operation beginning to shut down and initial decommissioning. Mazeika J; Marciulioniene D; Nedveckaite T; Jefanova O J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 1():28-37. PubMed ID: 26397747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An estimation method of the gross Beta activity in receiving river water of a nuclear power plant. Huang YJ; Tao YL; Zhang XF; Shang-Guan ZH Health Phys; 2010 Aug; 99 Suppl 2():S143-8. PubMed ID: 20622562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose assessment for the biota of terrestrial ecosystems in the shoreline zone of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant cooling pond. Oskolkov BY; Bondarkov MD; Gaschak SP; Maksimenko AM; Hinton TG; Coughlin D; Jannik GT; Farfán EB Health Phys; 2011 Oct; 101(4):349-61. PubMed ID: 21878760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Background and anthropogenic radionuclide derived dose rates to freshwater ecosystem: nuclear power plant cooling pond: reference organisms. Nedveckaite T; Filistovic V; Marciulioniene D; Prokoptchuk N; Plukiene R; Gudelis A; Remeikis V; Yankovich T; Beresford NA J Environ Radioact; 2011 Aug; 102(8):788-95. PubMed ID: 21601320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Establishing a database of radionuclide transfer parameters for freshwater wildlife. Yankovich T; Beresford NA; Fesenko S; Fesenko J; Phaneuf M; Dagher E; Outola I; Andersson P; Thiessen K; Ryan J; Wood MD; Bollhöfer A; Barnett CL; Copplestone D J Environ Radioact; 2013 Dec; 126():299-313. PubMed ID: 23103210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concentration of 129I in aquatic biota collected from a lake adjacent to the spent nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in Rokkasho, Japan. Ueda S; Kakiuchi H; Hasegawa H; Kawamura H; Hisamatsu S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Nov; 167(1-3):176-80. PubMed ID: 25935011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Applying DOE's Graded Approach for assessing radiation impacts to non-human biota at the INL. Morris RC J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):77-100. PubMed ID: 16459178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radionuclide concentration processes in marine organisms: A comprehensive review. Carvalho FP J Environ Radioact; 2018 Jun; 186():124-130. PubMed ID: 29126644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioaccumulation factors and the steady state assumption for cesium isotopes in aquatic foodwebs near nuclear facilities. Rowan DJ J Environ Radioact; 2013 Jul; 121():2-11. PubMed ID: 22717303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ecological and radio-ecological effects from long-term use of the lake Kyzyl-Tash as a cooling reservoir by the nuclear fuel cycle facility]. Smagin AI Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2010; 50(4):443-65. PubMed ID: 20968056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of the European Commission Marina II study: part II--effects of discharges of naturally occurring radioactive material. Betti M; Aldave de las Heras L; Janssens A; Henrich E; Hunter G; Gerchikov M; Dutton M; van Weers AW; Nielsen S; Simmonds J; Bexon A; Sazykina T; J Environ Radioact; 2004; 74(1-3):255-77. PubMed ID: 15063553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examination of the impact of radioactive liquid effluent releases from the Rancho Seco Nuclear Power Plant. Miller CW; Cottrell WD; Loar JM; Witherspoon JP Health Phys; 1990 Mar; 58(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 2312292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]