These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1059 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30449679)

  • 1. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of readability and quality of patient education materials specific to nocturnal enuresis.
    Mohile JM; Luzon JB; Agrawal G; Malhotra NR; Kan KM
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):558.e1-558.e7. PubMed ID: 37248162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
    Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
    Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internet Health Resources on Nocturnal Enuresis: A Readability, Quality, and Accuracy Analysis.
    Fung ACH; Lee MHL; Leung JL; Chan IHY; Wong KKY
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Feb; 34(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 37595631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
    Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy, readability, and quality of websites about metastatic renal cell carcinoma treatment.
    Shakhnazaryan N; Gima-Lange L; Desai A; Fitzgerald K; Kwon DH
    Urol Oncol; 2024 Nov; 42(11):375.e1-375.e13. PubMed ID: 38955572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.
    Al-Kharouf KFK; Khan FI; Robertson GA
    World J Methodol; 2023 Dec; 13(5):439-445. PubMed ID: 38229937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China.
    Li Y; Zhou X; Zhou Y; Mao F; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang X; Chang TH; Sun Q
    Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Apr; 104(4):858-864. PubMed ID: 32988687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
    Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.
    Alamoudi U; Hong P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 79(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 25554575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.
    Ocmen E; Erdemir I; Aksu Erdost H; Hanci V
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38569. PubMed ID: 38905405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
    Vågenes H; Pranić SM
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.