296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30449959)
1. A comparative evaluation of vertical marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique and direct (intraoral technique) and flexural strength of the materials: An
Dureja I; Yadav B; Malhotra P; Dabas N; Bhargava A; Pahwa R
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(4):314-320. PubMed ID: 30449959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Provisional Crowns Utilizing Three Distinct Materials.
Jalalian E; Younesi F; Golalipour S; Khorshidi S; Mahdavisaedabadi SH; Sayyari M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Nov; 24(11):853-858. PubMed ID: 38238272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns.
Abdullah AO; Tsitrou EA; Pollington S
J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 27383707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of Glass Ionomer-based Provisional Cement in CAD/CAM-Fabricated Interim Crowns: An in vitro Study.
Farah RI; Al-Harethi N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Oct; 17(10):801-806. PubMed ID: 27794149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the effects of finish line type and width on the fracture strength of provisional crowns.
Karaman T; Eser B; Altintas E; Atala MH
Odontology; 2021 Jan; 109(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 32537671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling.
Yao J; Li J; Wang Y; Huang H
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):649-57. PubMed ID: 24721504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative evaluation of the marginal accuracy of single crowns fabricated computer using aided design/computer aided manufacturing methods, self-curing resin and Luxatemp].
Jianming Y; Ying T; Feng P; Weixing X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 34(6):575-578. PubMed ID: 28318156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of marginal leakage of provisional crowns cemented with different temporary luting cements: In vitro study.
Arora SJ; Arora A; Upadhyaya V; Jain S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 27134427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of Marginal Integrity and Color Stability of Provisional Restoration Fabricated from Different Autopolymerizing Acrylic Resins - A Comparative Study.
Jafar Abdulla MU; Dafer Al Wadei MH; El-Patal MA; Sam G; Abokhlifa YH; Thorat A
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S616-S619. PubMed ID: 34447165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of layering gingiva-shade composite resin on the strength of denture base polymers.
Bedrossian EA; Chung KH; Ramos V
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):153.e1-153.e8. PubMed ID: 31326151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials.
Sampaio CS; Niemann KD; Schweitzer DD; Hirata R; Atria PJ
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 32937028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexural strength, surface roughness, micro-CT analysis, and microbiological adhesion of a 3D-printed temporary crown material.
Ribeiro AKC; de Freitas RFCP; de Carvalho IHG; de Miranda LM; da Silva NR; de Fátima Dantas de Almeida L; Zhang Y; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A; de Assunção E Souza RO
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 May; 27(5):2207-2220. PubMed ID: 36933047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of virtual cement gap settings on the marginal fit of cemented resin-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
Sultan S; Hegazy M; Shakal M; Magdy S
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):804.e1-804.e6. PubMed ID: 33934821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods.
Peng CC; Chung KH; Yau HT; Ramos V
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):514-522. PubMed ID: 31353116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of anterior provisional restorations fabricated using conventional and digital techniques - An
Alam M; Chugh A; Kumar A; Rathee M; Jain P
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):361-367. PubMed ID: 36511070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture strength testing of crowns made of CAD/CAM composite resins.
Okada R; Asakura M; Ando A; Kumano H; Ban S; Kawai T; Takebe J
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):287-292. PubMed ID: 29605190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal discrepancy dimensions of single unit metal crowns fabricated by using CAD-CAM-milled acrylate resin polymer blocks or a conventional waxing technique.
Lalande D; Hodd JA; Brousseau JS; Ramos V; Dunham D; Rueggeberg F
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jun; 119(6):948-953. PubMed ID: 29042116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques.
Peng CC; Chung KH; Ramos V
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 31702087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
