164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30450274)
1. Strong association between cervical and breast cancer screening behaviour among Danish women; A register-based cohort study.
Larsen SH; Virgilsen LF; Kristiansen BK; Andersen B; Vedsted P
Prev Med Rep; 2018 Dec; 12():349-354. PubMed ID: 30450274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined patterns of participation in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screenings and factors for non-participation in each screening among women in Japan.
Ishii K; Tabuchi T; Iso H
Prev Med; 2021 Sep; 150():106627. PubMed ID: 34019930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Levels and determinants of breast and cervical cancer screening uptake in HIV-infected women compared with the general population in France.
Tron L; Lert F; Spire B; Dray-Spira R;
HIV Med; 2017 Mar; 18(3):181-195. PubMed ID: 28967199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening among Nepalese women: Evidence from Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2022.
Lamichhane B; Adhikari B; Poudel L; Pandey AR; Kakchhapati S; K C SP; Giri S; Dulal BP; Joshi D; Gautam G; Baral SC
PLOS Glob Public Health; 2024; 4(3):e0002971. PubMed ID: 38466682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-assessed health, perceived stress and non-participation in breast cancer screening: A Danish cohort study.
Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Vedsted P
Prev Med; 2015 Dec; 81():392-8. PubMed ID: 26494608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Social inequalities in participation in cancer screening: does the mode of data collection matter? The CONSTANCES cohort.
Aranda E; Franck JE; Ringa V; Sassenou J; Coeuret-Pellicer M; Rigal L; Menvielle G
Eur J Public Health; 2021 Jul; 31(3):602-608. PubMed ID: 34233352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.
Staley H; Shiraz A; Shreeve N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Gajjar K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Sep; 9(9):CD002834. PubMed ID: 34694000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychiatric morbidity and non-participation in breast cancer screening.
Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Bech BH; Andersen B; Vedsted P
Breast; 2016 Feb; 25():38-44. PubMed ID: 26585065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening--population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography.
Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Vedsted P
BMC Cancer; 2012 Nov; 12():518. PubMed ID: 23151053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are immigrants and nationals born to immigrants at higher risk for delayed or no lifetime breast and cervical cancer screening? The results from a population-based survey in Paris metropolitan area in 2010.
Rondet C; Lapostolle A; Soler M; Grillo F; Parizot I; Chauvin P
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87046. PubMed ID: 24466323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychological factors and demands for breast and cervical cancer screening.
Jiang T; Wei D; Sha R; Zhang J; Zhang X; Feng R; Shen X; Kadetz P; Wang D
Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Jul; 101(7):1270-1275. PubMed ID: 29519655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of an Intervention in General Practice to Increase the Participation of Immigrants in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Møen KA; Kumar B; Igland J; Diaz E
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e201903. PubMed ID: 32236530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-participation in breast cancer screening among previous cancer patients.
Virgilsen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Vedsted P
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 Oct; 144(10):1959-1966. PubMed ID: 30097713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast and cervical cancer screening adherence in Jiangsu, China: An ecological perspective.
Sun Y; Ma Y; Cao M; Hu Z; Lin W; Chen M; He Y
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():967495. PubMed ID: 36033808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social support and non-participation in breast cancer screening: a Danish cohort study.
Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Vedsted P
J Public Health (Oxf); 2016 Jun; 38(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 25922368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening - A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark.
Harder E; Juul KE; Jensen SM; Thomsen LT; Frederiksen K; Kjaer SK
Prev Med; 2018 Jun; 111():94-100. PubMed ID: 29501474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
