BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30450621)

  • 1. On the efficiency of adaptive sample size design.
    Cui L; Zhang L
    Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(6):933-944. PubMed ID: 30450621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal adaptive group sequential design with flexible timing of sample size determination.
    Cui L; Zhang L; Yang B
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 63():8-12. PubMed ID: 28455234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size adaptation designs and efficiency comparison with group sequential designs.
    Cui L
    Stat Med; 2024 May; 43(11):2203-2215. PubMed ID: 38545849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
    Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the benefits of adaptive sequential designs in time-to-event endpoint settings.
    Emerson SC; Rudser KD; Emerson SS
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(11):1199-217. PubMed ID: 21538450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient adaptive designs with mid-course sample size adjustment in clinical trials.
    Bartroff J; Lai TL
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1593-611. PubMed ID: 18275090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimizing trial design in pharmacogenetics research: comparing a fixed parallel group, group sequential, and adaptive selection design on sample size requirements.
    Boessen R; van der Baan F; Groenwold R; Egberts A; Klungel O; Grobbee D; Knol M; Roes K
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(6):366-74. PubMed ID: 24214896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size adjustment designs with time-to-event outcomes: A caution.
    Freidlin B; Korn EL
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 28795844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
    Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive designs: The Swiss Army knife among clinical trial designs?
    Bretz F; Gallo P; Maurer W
    Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):417-424. PubMed ID: 28982262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size: understanding efficient types of adaptation.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Stat Med; 2013 Apr; 32(8):1259-75; discussion 1280-2. PubMed ID: 23081665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal flexible sample size design with robust power.
    Zhang L; Cui L; Yang B
    Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(19):3385-96. PubMed ID: 26999385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient group sequential designs when there are several effect sizes under consideration.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 16220524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the adaptive performance of flexible sample size designs with treatment difference in an interval.
    Liu GF; Zhu GR; Cui L
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 17634972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An objective re-evaluation of adaptive sample size re-estimation: commentary on 'Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs'.
    Mehta C; Liu L
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(3):350-8. PubMed ID: 26757953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some challenges with statistical inference in adaptive designs.
    Hung HM; Wang SJ; Yang P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(5):1059-72. PubMed ID: 24915027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expected Value of Sample Information to Guide the Design of Group Sequential Clinical Trials.
    Flight L; Julious S; Brennan A; Todd S
    Med Decis Making; 2022 May; 42(4):461-473. PubMed ID: 34859693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive trial designs.
    Lai TL; Lavori PW; Shih MC
    Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 2012; 52():101-10. PubMed ID: 21838549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive designs for sequential experiments.
    Lin ZY; Zhang LX
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci; 2003; 4(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 12659237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.