These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30451107)
1. Reaction Time of Erroneous Responses in the Go/No-Go Paradigm. Leblanc-Sirois Y; Braun CMJ; Elie-Fortier J Exp Psychol; 2018 Sep; 65(5):314-321. PubMed ID: 30451107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task. Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 27281747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pupillary responses and reaction times index different cognitive processes in a combined Go/Switch incidental learning task. Isabella SL; Urbain C; Cheyne JA; Cheyne D Neuropsychologia; 2019 Apr; 127():48-56. PubMed ID: 30771402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of variability of sequence length of go trials preceding a stop trial on ability of response inhibition in stop-signal task. Hiraoka K; Kinoshita A; Kunimura H; Matsuoka M Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29848189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior brain ERP patterns related to the go/no-go task in children. Ciesielski KT; Harris RJ; Cofer LF Psychophysiology; 2004 Nov; 41(6):882-92. PubMed ID: 15563341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: a comparison of young and elderly participants. Grandjean J; Collette F Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 21885178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence of partial response activation in a memory-search task. Shin E; Fabiani M; Gratton G Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 20(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 15183399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classic and false memory designs: an electrophysiological comparison. Nessler D; Friedman D; Bersick M Psychophysiology; 2004 Sep; 41(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 15318874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters. Zhao X; Liu X; Zan X; Jin G; Maes JH PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160595. PubMed ID: 27500831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses. Karatekin C; Couperus JW; Marcus DJ Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 15032983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of response inhibition in temporal preparation: evidence from a go/no-go task. Los SA Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):328-44. PubMed ID: 23969298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective memory and working memory: asymmetrical effects during frontal lobe TMS stimulation. Basso D; Ferrari M; Palladino P Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3282-90. PubMed ID: 20637788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Startle reveals an absence of advance motor programming in a Go/No-go task. Carlsen AN; Chua R; Dakin CJ; Sanderson DJ; Inglis JT; Franks IM Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18262355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contextual response time adaptation in the countermanding performance of rats. Beuk J; Beninger RJ; Mechefske E; Paré M Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():200-217. PubMed ID: 27646289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]