These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30451107)

  • 1. Reaction Time of Erroneous Responses in the Go/No-Go Paradigm.
    Leblanc-Sirois Y; Braun CMJ; Elie-Fortier J
    Exp Psychol; 2018 Sep; 65(5):314-321. PubMed ID: 30451107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 27281747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupillary responses and reaction times index different cognitive processes in a combined Go/Switch incidental learning task.
    Isabella SL; Urbain C; Cheyne JA; Cheyne D
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Apr; 127():48-56. PubMed ID: 30771402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of variability of sequence length of go trials preceding a stop trial on ability of response inhibition in stop-signal task.
    Hiraoka K; Kinoshita A; Kunimura H; Matsuoka M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29848189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior brain ERP patterns related to the go/no-go task in children.
    Ciesielski KT; Harris RJ; Cofer LF
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Nov; 41(6):882-92. PubMed ID: 15563341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: a comparison of young and elderly participants.
    Grandjean J; Collette F
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 21885178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence of partial response activation in a memory-search task.
    Shin E; Fabiani M; Gratton G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 20(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 15183399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaction time-related activity reflecting periodic, task-specific cognitive control.
    Barber AD; Pekar JJ; Mostofsky SH
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 296():100-108. PubMed ID: 26318935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classic and false memory designs: an electrophysiological comparison.
    Nessler D; Friedman D; Bersick M
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Sep; 41(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 15318874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters.
    Zhao X; Liu X; Zan X; Jin G; Maes JH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160595. PubMed ID: 27500831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses.
    Karatekin C; Couperus JW; Marcus DJ
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 15032983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of response inhibition in temporal preparation: evidence from a go/no-go task.
    Los SA
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):328-44. PubMed ID: 23969298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective memory and working memory: asymmetrical effects during frontal lobe TMS stimulation.
    Basso D; Ferrari M; Palladino P
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3282-90. PubMed ID: 20637788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Startle reveals an absence of advance motor programming in a Go/No-go task.
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Dakin CJ; Sanderson DJ; Inglis JT; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18262355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contextual response time adaptation in the countermanding performance of rats.
    Beuk J; Beninger RJ; Mechefske E; Paré M
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():200-217. PubMed ID: 27646289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quick and the dead: A paradigm for studying friendly fire.
    Munnik A; Näswall K; Woodward G; Helton WS
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Apr; 84():103032. PubMed ID: 31987515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibiting prepotent responses in the elderly: Distraction and disinhibition.
    Hsieh S; Wu M; Tang CH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 16(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 26369924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resisting distraction and response inhibition trigger similar enhancements of future performance.
    Bissett PG; Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():40-51. PubMed ID: 28843207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.