These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30451910)

  • 1. Effects of spatial consistency and individual difference on touch-induced visual suppression effect.
    Hidaka S; Suzuishi Y; Ide M; Wada M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17018. PubMed ID: 30451910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural mechanisms underlying touch-induced visual perceptual suppression: An fMRI study.
    Ide M; Hidaka S; Ikeda H; Wada M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37301. PubMed ID: 27874038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adapting the Crossmodal Congruency Task for Measuring the Limits of Visual-Tactile Interactions Within and Between Groups.
    Poole D; Couth S; Gowen E; Warren PA; Poliakoff E
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):227-44. PubMed ID: 26288897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual and Proprioceptive Influences on Tactile Spatial Processing in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
    Hense M; Badde S; Köhne S; Dziobek I; Röder B
    Autism Res; 2019 Dec; 12(12):1745-1757. PubMed ID: 31507084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual motion information modulates tactile roughness perception.
    Suzuishi Y; Hidaka S; Kuroki S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13929. PubMed ID: 32811859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rubber hand presentation modulates visuotactile interference effect especially in persons with high autistic traits.
    Wada M; Ide M
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 26358127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating visual-tactile interactions over time and space in adults with autism.
    Poole D; Gowen E; Warren PA; Poliakoff E
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2015 Oct; 45(10):3316-26. PubMed ID: 26063447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seeing an image of the hand affects performance on a crossmodal congruency task for sequences of events.
    O' Dowd A; Sorgini F; Newell FN
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Apr; 80():102900. PubMed ID: 32114256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No Evidence for a Role of Spatially Modulated α-Band Activity in Tactile Remapping and Short-Latency, Overt Orienting Behavior.
    Ossandón JP; König P; Heed T
    J Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 40(47):9088-9102. PubMed ID: 33087476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the Role of Leading Sensory Modality and Autistic Traits in the Visual-Tactile Temporal Binding Window.
    Huntley MK; Nguyen A; Albrecht MA; Marinovic W
    Multisens Res; 2023 Oct; 36(7):683-702. PubMed ID: 37903498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 15907299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Autism-Spectrum Quotient and Visual Search: Shallow and Deep Autistic Endophenotypes.
    Gregory BL; Plaisted-Grant KC
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2016 May; 46(5):1503-12. PubMed ID: 24077740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tool use modulates early stages of visuo-tactile integration in far space: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Forsberg A; O'Dowd A; Gherri E
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jul; 145():42-54. PubMed ID: 30970269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-related potential evidence for a dynamic (re-)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual-tactile interactions.
    Ley P; Steinberg U; Hanganu-Opatz IL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1466-74. PubMed ID: 25879770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kimura Y; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction of perceptual grouping and crossmodal temporal capture in tactile apparent-motion.
    Chen L; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e17130. PubMed ID: 21383834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.