98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30452354)
1. Acoustic Characterization of the CLINIcell for Ultrasound Contrast Agent Studies.
Beekers I; van Rooij T; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Verweij MD; Kooiman K
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Jan; 66(1):244-246. PubMed ID: 30452354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acoustic Characterization of a Vessel-on-a-Chip Microfluidic System for Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery.
Beekers I; van Rooij T; Verweij MD; Versluis M; de Jong N; Trietsch SJ; Kooiman K
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Apr; 65(4):570-581. PubMed ID: 29610087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonic Characterization of Ibidi μ-Slide I Luer Channel Slides for Studies With Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Pakdaman Zangabad R; Li H; Kouijzer JJP; Langeveld SAG; Beekers I; Verweij M; De Jong N; Kooiman K
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2023 May; 70(5):422-429. PubMed ID: 37027575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Opening of endothelial cell-cell contacts due to sonoporation.
Beekers I; Vegter M; Lattwein KR; Mastik F; Beurskens R; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Verweij MD; Kooiman K
J Control Release; 2020 Jun; 322():426-438. PubMed ID: 32246975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Focal areas of increased lipid concentration on the coating of microbubbles during short tone-burst ultrasound insonification.
Kooiman K; van Rooij T; Qin B; Mastik F; Vos HJ; Versluis M; Klibanov AL; de Jong N; Villanueva FS; Chen X
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180747. PubMed ID: 28686673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined Confocal Microscope and Brandaris 128 Ultra-High-Speed Camera.
Beekers I; Lattwein KR; Kouijzer JJP; Langeveld SAG; Vegter M; Beurskens R; Mastik F; Verduyn Lunel R; Verver E; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Kooiman K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 45(9):2575-2582. PubMed ID: 31262523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lipid shedding from single oscillating microbubbles.
Luan Y; Lajoinie G; Gelderblom E; Skachkov I; van der Steen AF; Vos HJ; Versluis M; De Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1834-46. PubMed ID: 24798388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressure-dependent attenuation and scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles at low acoustic pressures.
Emmer M; Vos HJ; Goertz DE; van Wamel A; Versluis M; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 18829153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interaction of an ultrasound-activated contrast microbubble with a wall at arbitrary separation distances.
Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7909-25. PubMed ID: 26407104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography.
Ital Heart J; 2004 Apr; 5(4):309-34. PubMed ID: 15185894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of boundary proximity on the response of individual ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Helfield BL; Leung BY; Goertz DE
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 59(7):1721-45. PubMed ID: 24619133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Acoustic Device for Ultra High-Speed Quantification of Cell Strain During Cell-Microbubble Interaction.
Pattinson O; Keller SB; Evans ND; Pierron F; Carugo D
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2023 Oct; 9(10):5912-5923. PubMed ID: 37747762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles.
Langeveld SAG; Beekers I; Collado-Lara G; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Kooiman K
Pharmaceutics; 2021 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 33477843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental investigations of nonlinearities and destruction mechanisms of an experimental phospholipid-based ultrasound contrast agent.
Casciaro S; Palmizio Errico R; Conversano F; Demitri C; Distante A
Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 17220727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction.
Yeh CK; Su SY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1281-91. PubMed ID: 18343019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic Behavior of Microbubbles during Long Ultrasound Tone-Burst Excitation: Mechanistic Insights into Ultrasound-Microbubble Mediated Therapeutics Using High-Speed Imaging and Cavitation Detection.
Chen X; Wang J; Pacella JJ; Villanueva FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):528-538. PubMed ID: 26603628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial and acoustic pressure dependence of microbubble-mediated gene delivery targeted using focused ultrasound.
Rahim AA; Taylor SL; Bush NL; ter Haar GR; Bamber JC; Porter CD
J Gene Med; 2006 Nov; 8(11):1347-57. PubMed ID: 16981246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The onset of microbubble vibration.
Emmer M; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):941-9. PubMed ID: 17451868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resonance frequencies of lipid-shelled microbubbles in the regime of nonlinear oscillations.
Doinikov AA; Haac JF; Dayton PA
Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 18977009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
